4 Years ago I created this blog. 4 YEARS. I can’t believe it. 

I’ve wanted to stop so many times, but something kept me going. Sometimes it was just myself saying “you’ll regret it.” Sometimes it was followers or mutuals telling me that they would miss my posts and it would be hard to find fandom related things. I wouldn’t change the last 4 years for anything. 

Thank you to everyone who has followed me, reblogs my posts, asks questions, asks me to find a specific post or uses the archive in general. 

A thank you to the person who gave me the idea for the blog in the first place: @skulls-and-tea

And a big thank you to the following people who keep me going with their own posts:

@timelorddetectivewizard221b @whymofftiss @iamjustreading @galpalkirk @rdjlock @anotherwellkeptsecret @bakerstreetbabes @cupidford @cumbergoddess @enerjax @emillu @finalproblem @francesca-wayland @firstmeetings @gingerhermit @ghostly-harmless @hillivanilli @ivyblossom @jenna221b @johnlockiseverywhere @jvhnlck @kaleb221 @livebloggingmydescentintomadness @loudest-subtext-in-tv @legendofaghoststory @mycroftslittlebrother @nixxie-pic @opnorbury @oneredbuttonhole @postcardsfromtheoryland @palaceforstars @sherlockology @ughbenedict @usethetagbenedict @vapidcolors @watsonsdick @wolfcharm @nightvcle @hear-the-people-sing @boytoynameddean @benaddictedgirl @artfulkindoforder @chillingabsinthe @myladylyssa @lokilaufeyj @knowmymethods @pagimag @shurplepurpofsex @savetonystark @gunsandships24601 @mzdono @yanfreak @pinchofspicemakeseverythingnice @9to5inthetardis @mscaninibal @i-gave-up-looking-for-a-username @ericswifetara @sectoralheterochromiairidum @booksbroadwayb99 @surfingwaves101 @whereisjawn @ahighlyfunctioningfangirl @consultinghuntress-67 @highlyfunctioningassbutt @elledict @hackkelly @fiftysevvenacademics @moose945 @thelostsmiles @jheller7 @sherlockgayaturgy @ninfa-roma-41 @cumber-blonde @booklover223 @nickischi @ravenmorganleigh @thewatsonbeekeepers @moonlightlock @vulgarweed @amo-not-ammo

I know I’ve missed A LOT, but know that I appreciative everyone that has interacted with this blog over the last 4 years.

To those that have moved on from fandom:

Thank you for your time and insight. I miss seeing your posts across my dash and the discussions we would have. Even if you aren’t around to see this anymore I still have to say it. (I wish I could magically send gratitude to people via brainwaves).

(Also big hug to @baezukhov who has moved on from fandom but is still an awesome person).

To those still here, making stuff or even just here to share it:

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I wouldn’t be here without any of you. Or I would be shouting into the void at least.

Here’s to another year (and another BBC Sherlock Haitus)!

Some Kinda Subtext on Twitter: “I’m really glad to see people moving on from the ARG idea. I know it was hard for some people to understand last year why I was so against it, and it made some people defensive, but it was seriously out of concern for the sorts of things people are recounting now.”

i-love-the-bee-keeper:

Take time to read LSiT tweets. Good points on so many fronts, not just the ARG idea. With a few people still struggling with the treatment of johnlockers by Mofftiss, Nat’s words may help. 

Over a year out from s4-everyone needs to read these

Some Kinda Subtext on Twitter: “I’m really glad to see people moving on from the ARG idea. I know it was hard for some people to understand last year why I was so against it, and it made some people defensive, but it was seriously out of concern for the sorts of things people are recounting now.”

i-love-the-bee-keeper:

plaidadder:

ruth0007:

soundsofmyuniverse:

To the very best of times, John.

This is how I feel about fandom. A year out from the last new episodes. Less voices. More echoes.  

Well, every fandom sort of gets quiet when there’s no more new content. But I think this show ended in a way that makes it really hard to continue creating it, which is basically what fandom eventually does in this situation.

So, first of all, I’m sure there are Sherlock fans out there who loved “The Final Problem.” There are X-Files fans out there, I have discovered, who will defend anything Chris Carter writes, no matter how bad it is. For those fans who love the show unconditionally, I’m sure the conversation continues without a hitch. I just don’t interact a lot with that segment of the fandom.

There’s probably also a section of the Sherlock fandom which was never invested in Johnlock, liked Mary Morstan fine, accepted the craziness of “His Last Vow,” “The Six Thatchers,” and “The Lying Detective”….and then got to “The Final Problem” and just went, NO. Because really…the whole Eurus thing was a truly terrible decision, just from a series arc standpoint. It really drives home how little Moffat knows or cares about plotting and narrative. At the end of the show you should be resolving things that were introduced earlier, not introducing brand new characters and plot lines. Who in their right mind builds the last episode of their show around a character the viewers have never heard of? Instead of using “The Final Problem” to resolve things between John and Sherlock, they spent 90 minutes answering a question that the viewers had never asked themselves and didn’t care about. If they’d introduced Eurus at the beginning of S2 or something, they’d have had a chance to develop her and then maybe by S4 the viewers would have something invested in her. Instead, the viewers don’t even know she exists until the last 5 minutes of the second-to-last episode. I don’t know how that made sense to anyone.

But on the segment of the fandom that was invested in Johnlock, the impact of TFP was devastating, both to individuals and to the community. Because it really is in S4 that it becomes clear that Moffat and Gatiss have become fed up with the whole canon Johnlock thing and are actively trying to destroy that reading of the show. As exhibit A I offer the sudden reintroduction of Irene Adler as a potential romantic partner for Sherlock. She doesn’t appear; but John spends part of that climactic conversation in “The Lying Detective” trying to convince Sherlock to re-connect with her, and it’s revealed that she’s still occasionally texting him. I had to rewatch “The Final Problem” to write “Christmas Time After Time,” and one thing I noticed this time around is that in the final montage of the two of them in 221b, there’s a shot of Sherlock texting someone, “You know where to find me.” He can’t be texting Moriarty or Eurus; John’s in the room with him; I figure he’s supposed to be sending that to Irene Adler. 

So after TFP, that segment of the fandom split in all kinds of directions. There’s the split between people who now accept that Moffat and Gatiss either are no longer or were never planning for a canon Johnlock ending, and the people who are keeping TJLC alive by inventing ever more elaborate explanations for why Johnlock really IS canon. This split has, I think, been very destructive. It used to be easy enough for people who were pro-Johnlock but not TJLC to interact with TJLC true believers without anyone getting their feelings hurt. But now, the TJLC reading of the show is so divergent from the non-TJLC reading of it–the two groups cannot agree even on things like the number of episodes of S4 that were actually shot, or whether/how much of any given S3 or S4 episode is set in someone’s mind palace or part of someone’s dying hallucination–that these two segments of the fandom don’t share enough common assumptions to have a real conversation about the show. Then, amongst the non- or ex-TJLCers, there was the split about how to respond to Moffat and Gatiss’s refusal to make Johnlock canon after having hinted at it fairly persistently in the first two seasons. And so on.

But for the Johnlock-positive but also non- or ex-TJLC segment of the fandom, which is the part of the fandom that I have the most contact with, I think the show just hurt a lot of people’s feelings so much that they don’t want to maintain a relationship with it. Moffat and Gatiss, as showrunners, never cared about the viewer’s emotions; it was all about what they wanted and how clever and badass they could be. They lost their grip on the fact that fans engage with television, primarily, emotionally. The small screen pulls people in emotionally in ways that the big screen doesn’t, and their emotional investment in characters and relationships makes them vulnerable. So it is possible to give your fans an emotional shock so painful that it functions as aversion therapy. That’s what happened with the “Children of Earth” series of Torchwood, which not only killed off half of the canon m/m couple but forced the surviving partner to commit an act so morally heinous and emotionally painful that I, at least, had no desire to watch that character do anything else, ever again. 

I don’t think Moffat and Gatiss ever understood that. For instance, the biggest obstacle to me in trying to write fic about this show after S4, apart from the absolutely bonkers plotting, was John beating Sherlock up at the end of “The Lying Detective.” How do they get past that? How do *I*, as a viewer, get past that? I don’t. And that’s a loss.

Anyway. Yeah, echoes, I guess. Echoes and elegies for a show I used to love.

@plaidadder Eloquently put, thank you.

What happened to Sherlock? Part III – Drugs and weirdness

possiblyimbiassed:

At this stage, I think no-one would deny that drugs is a recurring theme in BBC Sherlock. And it seems to me that the more the show progresses in time, the more focus we get on this drug theme. The last time I heard of it from fandom was right before Christmas, when @someovermind posted this video made by nerdwriter1 about the very creative filming in TLD, where we’re seeing things from Sherlock’s perspective when he is high on drugs, and also displaying some symptoms of abstinence. It’s a great video, I can really recommend it.

image

@someovermind  ended their comment of the video with these words:
So maybe we should be on the lookout for camera angles that are impossible because they obviously point to Sherlock’s drug induced state ??**;¿¿ And if they are anywhere else it obviously directs us to EMP??¿¿

I think that’s a very good idea, and it fits nicely with the kind of exercise I’ve been planning to do in this meta.

As I’ve said before, I believe there is a ‘game’ proposed in BBC Sherlock which we, as an audience, are challenged to play, by trying to solve the enigma of what has actually happened to Sherlock and why has the show become weirder and weirder over time.

This is the third part of a meta series where I try to look at BBC Sherlock with a ‘scientific’ approach.  I’m trying to use Sherlock Holmes’ methods of data collection, deductions, hypotheses and predictions, test them and thereby try to solve the puzzles presented to us, as explained in my introduction. As you can see in the introduction, Sherlock’s methods are very similar to the scientific method, which is used by researchers in general and scientists in particular. Which means that we’ll ask some questions that enable us to put up hypotheses. Based on the hypotheses we’ll make some predictions that can be tested with observations from the show. (If you want to read my first two metas of the series, just follow the links of the hypotheses #1 and #2).

Hypothesis #1 was: John’s blog is the most truthful account of the actual events. 

And Hypothesis #2 (originally @raggedyblue’s idea ) was:  The show up until John’s wedding is Sherlock reliving their story together in his MP, after reading John’s blog.

These two hypotheses can definitely be wrong, no doubt about that. But at least I’ve tried to test them, finding out a certain amount of evidence that I think speaks for them being at least plausible.

In this meta, though, I’m going to assume that both these hypotheses are indeed true. In other words: In the show ‘Sherlock’ (as the name actually suggests) we’re inside Sherlock’s head all along. And based on this assumption, I’ll try to explore which role Sherlock’s drug use may have in the story we’ve been shown from ASiP to TSoT. As usual, the meta is lengthy (this time even longer than usual), so you’ll find most of it under the cut.

Czytaj dalej

deadcatwithaflamethrower:

demad69:

therarestunderrated:

s-n-arly:

greater-than-the-sword:

Underlined PSA

Figment, the recently closed writing website, has just launched (after a long delay) their long-awaited successor to figment known as Underlined, where users can post their work and receive feedback, supposedly.

DO NOT USE UNDERLINED. DO NOT POST YOUR WORK ON UNDERLINED.

Underlined’s terms and conditions contains a clause stating that the rights to all your work that you post on their website belongs to them!!!!

Underlined belongs to Penguin Random House. This is an extremely dirty trick for them to play on writers, especially young writers and children, who come to the internet to get feedback and will lose the rights to their work. Please boost!!!

For my writing friends looking for an online writing community, DO NOT USE Underlined. 

I went to confirm @greater-than-the-sword‘s post, because seriously publishers are still pulling this garbage?  And yes, they are.  If you want to check out the full terms and conditions, have at it.  They are full of writers’ nightmares, a few of which I’ll highlight under the cut.

Keep reading

Be aware guys

@deadcatwithaflamethrower

Spreading necessary word.

astudyintea:

sometimes I remember just how cinematographically gorgeous the six thatchers and the lying detective were then I remember how the final problem was filmed in a spray painted cardboard box held together with duct tape with a spare camcorder found in someone’s basement then stored on a usb taped to a few dollar bills and left out on a table with a sign in neon lights blinking out the words “Russia whatever you do don’t take and leak this cinematic masterpiece moff thinks is better than asib owo” and I laugh hysterically and then I black out