teapotsubtext:

keagan-ashleigh:

ciel-doux:

Does anyone have like a comprehensive list of BBCone tweets about Sherlock, namely the really incriminating ones

@ciel-doux Here’s some I archived in my blog:

https://twitter.com/BBCOne/status/635902159725314048
https://twitter.com/BBCOne/status/635902668414685184

These ones are screenshots, I don’t have the link to the tweets themselves:
http://keagan-ashleigh.tumblr.com/post/127501773701/glassofteajlc-honestly
http://keagan-ashleigh.tumblr.com/post/127509949561/57circlesofhell

And here a collection of bbcthree’s tweets (including screenshots), if it can be useful too:
https://twitter.com/bbcthree/status/635896930485166080
http://keagan-ashleigh.tumblr.com/post/126942847136/constancecream-the-great-tweet-off-bbc-one
http://keagan-ashleigh.tumblr.com/post/126942948696
http://keagan-ashleigh.tumblr.com/post/136419502171/bbc-one-and-bbc-three-live-tweeting-the-abominable  (there’s links to the tweets in this one)

This is pretty much all I found on my blog, be free to add links if you have others.

retweet with #norbury and #bbcqueerbait

vanetti:

astudyinqueerbaiting:

vanetti:

astudyinqueerbaiting:

@bbcthree as shipper on deck? Queerbaiting. “Sherlock’s back and is in love”? Queerbaiting. The show’s official YouTube channel referring to Sherlock and John as “the greatest love story”? Queerbaiting. Not to mention, of course, the endless list of romantic tropes.

Not in our minds, BBC & Hartswood. Don’t give us that filthy patronising bs.

the person who ran the bbc three blog was just a social media coordinator who shipped johnlock just like the rest of us, that was never ever a part of this so leave three out of it

It’s not against that person, that person was merely an employee, but that person was doing a job and the company that hired them, and Hartswood as well (because it was their show) allowed it knowing what was in store.

i know them personally and no, literally no one told them to do what they did, they were just having a good time on the tungle dot hell like the rest of us, so like i said, leave that entire facet of the fandom experience out of this

also bbc three, the whole of it, has absolutely NOTHING to do with hartswood or sherlock whatsoever

^ our frustration should be with BBC as a company, not with offshoot channels.

shag-me-senseless-watson:

tworidiculousmen:

Tag your receipts with #bbcqueerbait and #norbury to @bbcone and @bbcthree on twitter!!! Remember retweets count and you need to add something besides the hashtags for it to trend. Please do this. Even if there is a 4th ep, we didn’t deserve this and our voices matter; let them know.

But wasn’t BBC Three all for johnlock??

Yeah, the employee who ran it was clearly one of us (idk about now though). I don’t think our beef should be with three, it should be with BBC as a whole. Although, I wonder if BBC cared they would have stopped BBC three from interacting with us they way they did. *shrug*