Rachel Talalay and the Case of the Missing Transitions

nicishi:

fffinnagain:

Some times experiments don’t work out. Sometime big projects include mistakes and it takes a lot of compromises to satisfy the real goal. So was the case with The Six Thatchers.

To a room of ~100 people, Rachel Talalay explained something of the complicated backstory to the first episode of Series 4 and shared with us a little of the amazing footage that had to be left on the cutting room floor.

In Mark Gatiss’s initial script, the story was going to be told with a complicated chronology. The story was supposed to start somewhere in the middle, with flashbacks inserted into scenes. This show has played with chronology before, but this plan was more ambitions and experimental than previous episodes. In the spirit of Sherlock’s cinematographic ingenuity, Talalay decided to demarcate these flashbacks with fantastic transitions in and out of the scenes into which they were inlayed.  

The filming proceeded with this non-chronological order of scenes, but when the material was assembled in a temp edit, it became apparent that the narrative didn’t really work. Talalay had her doubts about how it came together, and Moffat and Gatiss made the call to change the sequence to the straight forward chronology we saw broadcast. Talalay took pains to explain that the switch was necessary for the sake of the story and that no one was at fault for how the experiment failed. They took a risk together and these things don’t always pan out.

The choice to reorder was the right one, but it was also a very difficult compromise for two reasons. First it changed the purpose of many scenes, and with no time to reshoot they had to work out new criteria to determine the best takes to make a cohesive narrative from what they had. Second, it meant abandoning these amazing transitions that were in and of themselves creative and technical acheivements that each took days to prepare and shoot.

It was these transitions that Talalay shared with us at Sherlocked USA 2018. They will never be released, so here are my descriptions of the transitions she shared. Some of them involve scenes that weren’t part of the final edit at all. I’ve done the best I can to describe what I can remember from seeing these only twice.

1. In and Out of Cars This seems to be on the way to the first case with Greg, on the way to the WELSBOROUGH HOUSE. John, Sherlock, and Greg are in a taxi in the middle of the day. Greg says “So how long has it been then” and John replies “Three months.” Sherlock rises from his right-forward facing seat and steps out of the passenger door into day light. The camera approaches his back until we only see the coat. Camera recedes and it is night. Sherlock steps back into the right passenger seat while typing in his mobile and Mary is wheezing in labour. The camera pivots to also catch John at the steering wheel, as seen in the show. There is another transition back to the original taxi shot and John repeats “About three months.”

2. Walking through Doorways: As Greg, Sherlock, and John approach the door to the Welsborough House, Greg says “…We thought we’d never see you again.” Sherlock replies “You weren’t the only ones.” As Sherlock steps through the doorway, he pass into the room where he and Mycroft are interrogated by Sir Edwin and Lady Smallwood. He sits down and takes off his coat. The scene that followed was the one used to open The Six Thatchers.

At then end of this scene, Sherlock says “Because I love it.” and walks out the door and back into the WELSBOROUGH HOUSE.

3. To and From the Christening: John is looking at bus shelter and a bus goes by and reveals that he is wearing church clothes at the Christening for Rosie. John says to Sherlock something along the lines of “You could come visit Rosie” and Sherlock replies “The conversation would be a bit onesided.”

Another shot of Sherlock approaching the camera down the aisle, framed by the arches of the church. I’m not sure if this transitioned to another scene.

4. Through the Mirror: In the sceen where Mary finds Sherlock in the Moroccan hotel, the shot begins with her standing by the table looking accusing and Sherlock sitting on the floor crossed-legged. Sherlock gets up and walks towards a mirror by a curtain in the back of the room. In the curtain we see a reflection of Mycroft’s underground office. Sherlock walks past the mirror into the scene where Mycroft begins by reciting the wikipedia article for “Agra”

When that scene ends, Sherlock rises from his seat and walks back to the mirror to pass back into the Moroccan hotel room and sits down on the floor again to pick up the conversation with Mary.

5. Lastly, one of the magical transitions that were kept was Ajay remembering his torture and then falling back onto the carpet. Apparently the sequence was initially filmed as a single shot, with four sets lined up side by side. Like wow.

***

I can’t attest that these are perfect descriptions of what was in these shots, and I know I’m missing some details. If anyone else remembers other things, please add them in.

Talalay had every reason to be proud of these transitions. They were breath taking (my descriptions do not do them justice!) and the audience gasped and clapped through the three minutes of footage that she shared. I am so sorry they had to make the compromise of removing these. I understand that it was deemed necessary, and Talalay was very clear that she agreed with the decision to change the order of the scenes, but it is a tragedy that we lost these beautiful tricky transitions.

So now please someone explain how johnlock somehow became TFP.

And as I am typing this it occurs to me, johnlock literally IS -still- the final problem.

notagarroter:

bonadompna:

Visualizing Camera Movement in
Scene I of Sherlock’s “The Six Thatchers”

Camera movement is one of the most basic aspects of cinematic storytelling and when you notice it, it’s usually because you’re meant to. The kind of camera movement I’m mapping in my Sherlock video above is extremely subtle. It’s not the kind of camera work that will win awards or accolades because it’s as fundamental to cinematic (and now television) grammar as as my first person writing style is to this meta. You’ll see a restless camera everywhere now that I’ve brought it to your attention. 

In the case of Sherlock the first of six similar shots in T6T’s introduction is the only completely static shot where the camera doesn’t move at all, and it’s the shot that establishes Sherlock’s boredom. His total disengagement from Mycroft’s proceedings has gone unnoticed for a spell until Mycroft realizes his little brother has been too still, too quiet for too long-  while silently and flippantly tweeting.

Here are some examples of more obvious camera work. It’s a short video and worth a gander.

Interesting! It’s striking that the director would make this choice, given that I assume a static camera would be the easiest, most intuitive choice. Why bother with a moving camera for such a subtle effect? But it’s true that it does make the scene just a bit more visually interesting, even when we’re not consciously aware of it.

filming choices….

monikakrasnorada:

kateis-cakeis:

loveismyrevolution:

image

this shot of Sherlock in TLD (in the morgue of Culvertons hospital, when he realises that Faith never was at 221B) is very prominent in choice of framing and lighting….

we saw this kind of lighting only twice before

image

Sherlock in HLV in his MP after being shot by Mary

image

CAM in HLV in the “Appledore vaults” which are in fact his MP

Both times related to mind palaces… 

I know he is shattered in TLD

and devastated by drugs

…. but what he experiences in that scene is (on the surface level) actually NOT the realisation of having been in his MP! If anything fake!Faith has been an illusion!! And his MP has never been an illusion!!!

But couldn’t that moment of horror in TLD also be a crack in the surface… ?

Sherlock realising that this doesn’t make any sense if it is not in his MP, one of his mind experiments, the script of a mind play… Sherlock realising that he isn’t really living and experiencing all this, but that it takes place in his mind and why… because he’s actually still back here:

image

sidenote (and maybe he even then realises that he has to wake up…?)

sidenote 2 (is it possible that that’s the reason everything goes wild afterwards?? Sherlock “going wild” in his mind, exhaust the boundries to “break free”??? Just a thought…)

@ebaeschnbliah @gosherlocked @monikakrasnorada @isitandwonder @yan-yae @tjlcisthenewsexy @tendergingergirl @the-7-percent-solution

Whoa

That’s exactly how I always took that moment of your first pic, @loveismyrevolution. On first viewing, I was just as gutted as everyone else by John’s actions in that morgue scene,  until I re-watched and paid attention to that flash of Sherlock there. We don’t get a ‘deduction’ from Sherlock in that moment, so why are we shown it unless we are to make the same connection to the shot in HLV? Where that moment was a mp scene within a mp scene. 

What further sold the unreality of that moment was that John tells Sherlock to wake up! It felt- if we were supposed to take that scene as real– it would have been a better choice to say “snap out of it!” Wake up is so very telling as a reality bleed-through moment, or even just a subtle clue to the audience to remember that Sherlock isn’t awake.

As to your sidenote, again, I have to agree. @the-7-percent-solution said TFP was the equivalent of a nervous breakdown and I think that is so close to what happens. Sherlock’s been out and suffering for a while (I imagine there really has been quite some time has elapsed) and the longer a patient remains in coma / unconscious the greater the risk to the brain and its recovery. I really feel like that is a bit of the why of Skull hell. I think it reflects Sherlock’s brain and the damage that may be occurring to it. I made a post months ago (which of course I can’t find at the mo but will try to link it late if I do) about just this idea and used this photo as an example:

I mean, are we not  supposed to make the connection to this??? 

Only to add this bit of WTFery on top:

WHY is there a monitor with “someone’s” brain activity being broadcast to the dudes that are in charge of maintaining the security of Sherrinford??

TFP has always felt (and looked) like the last throes of Sherlock’s ability. It’s all he can do to keep it together, the deterioration of his brain function at critical levels. It’s why the ending of the ep felt and looked so final and dreamlike- Sherlock’s version of heaven and going towards the light.

Okay, I just made myself really sad there. I don’t believe Sherlock is dead but very very close to it by the end of TFP.

@ebaeschnbliah @gosherlocked  @isitandwonder@yan-yae @tjlcisthenewsexy @tendergingergirl @the-7-percent-solution

Hi! Do you happen to know at which scenes in T6T and TLD the characters look directly at the camera? I’ve heard it happens four times, but I’ve only found two of them. Thanks!

inevitably-johnlocked:

Hi Lovely!

Certainly! Here’s Sherlock in T6T at 14:58:

image

John in T6T at 1:10:04:

image

And there’s this one in TLD at 36:12, which is REALLY quick and if you blink you miss it!

image

And Culverton in TLD at 1:15:16 (this one I’m a bit “meh” about because I don’t think this was an “unintentional” fourth wall break):

image

And if you want to be pedantic, Sherlock literally breaks down 4 walls in TFP at 1:12:55

image

And people have said that this one of Jim in TFP at 38:25 is also fourth-wall breaking, but I don’t consider it this because he’s talking to Mycroft; the camera is where Myc’s shoulder is:

image

It’s not fourth wall breaking, to me, if the character is talking to another character. Sherlock does it often enough in the series when we are “the deduction wall”, as in when we are watching from the POV of the wall or the monitor. These ones are more noticeable because these are the ACTORS – NOT THE CHARACTERS – LOOKING AT THE CAMERA. 

The John one is the most blatant one, I think, because it’s ALL MARTIN, and it’s  the LONGEST ONE; HE LITERALLY ACKNOWLEDGES THE CAMERA AND TAKES A SIP OF WINE:

image
image

So yeah, gang, please add others if you see them. Remember: they have to NOT be part of the “script” of sorts. Just the actors breaking character and staring at the camera.