Season 1 Mofftiss: Let’s allude to Sherlock’s history with drug addiction as a nod to the canon.
Season 2 Mofftiss: Let’s also make Sherlock behave like an idiot and trash his house and sniff cigarette smoke ten inches away from a stranger beCAUSE HE LOVES DRUGS SO MUCH
Season 3 Mofftiss: LET’S GET SHERLOCK DRUNK AND THEN PUT HIM IN A DRUG DEN AND MAKE HIM HIGH TO FOOL THAT CREEPY VILLAIN
Season 4 Mofftiss: HAHA, LET’S ACTUALLY MAKE SHERLOCK OVERDOSE ON DRUGS AND RUIN HIS LIFE

What was Sherlock on in TLD?

ravenmorganleigh:

aphraelsan:

I saw someone ask this question today, and it got me thinking. My guess is a whole damn lot of stuff. More than likely he was speedballing, or using uppers and downers together (most commonly using cocaine in conjunction with heroin or morphine, frequently in the same syringe). He definitely seemed to be creating his own drug cocktails in the drug lab he and Wiggins have set up in the kitchen. Likely additives could be: prescription benzodiazepines (like xanex, Valium, or Klonapin) MDMA (commonly called Molly), maybe some Ritalin, amphetamines… I’m forgetting some and folks can feel free to chime in.

Despite Mycroft’s quip that his home is “practically a meth lab,” I don’t see Sherlock Holmes ever using meth. While I easily believe him risking his health and his life, I can’t imagine him risking his mind.

If he always makes a list for Mycroft, it means there is almost always more than one thing on it.

Molly tells him, “if you keep taking what you’re taking at the rate you’re taking it, you’ll be dead in weeks.” You can ingest most drugs on an ongoing basis for years upon years without worrying it’ll kill you in weeks. There are some drugs that are much easier to accidentally OD on all by themselves, but that’s typically due to additives (ex a lot of the heroin coming into the US right now). As a rich graduate chemist, Sherlock seems to be able to sidestep the additives problem. However, a speedball is unpredictable even for a graduate chemist who can afford the “good stuff” (i.e. so many celebrities OD on drug combos).

Additionally, it sounds as if his rate of consumption was causing kidney failure. Which is just… impressive. It also explains the withdrawal, which sounds like it was fairly awful.

This is a bunch of thrown-together thoughts and my perspective is from the CD treatment/ therapy side, not medical. I’m absolutely interested in other people’s thoughts on the subject. I was going to chat about Sherlock’s drug use in HLV, but this got super long so I’ll post about it separately.

The problem is that the writers don’t seem to know anything about drugs– other than bad 190′s fantasy ideas of what drugs actually are and what they can do….

sussexbound:

hudders-and-hiddles:

sussexbound:

happierstill:

I’ve often wondered if John’s easy forgiveness of Sherlock after being drugged in Baskerville ended up hurting them both more than helping. 

Sherlock drugged John. A man with PTSD. A man that could have easily hurt himself or others while he was under the influence of the drug. John was terrified. And yet? He forgives him without even a moment’s hesitation. 

If John had been more livid, more upset, asked Sherlock “why would you ever think that is okay to do that to me?” and stayed angry for some stretch of time, Sherlock would have not come back from TRF thinking all would be forgiven in a moment’s notice. 

Sherlock would have known that jumping off the roof at St. Bart’s in front of John, and staying dead for two years, is not something easily forgivable. John was betrayed. Yet Sherlock comes back expecting the easy forgiveness he saw in Grimpen. 

John does forgive Sherlock in TEH but marries Mary because he knows he can’t trust his heart to Sherlock. 

What would have happened if the forgiveness after Baskerville wasn’t as easy? I think the entire jump and aftermath would have changed. 

Their play with one another, and the affects that has on their mutual trust does interest me a great deal (yes I have a half finished meta on it).  I think that HoB, was the first instance of Sherlock pushing John almost beyond what he could bear, and you can see that Sherlock is angry at himself for it.  

In HoB John told Sherlock, “Get me out, Sherlock.  You have got to get me out!”  But Sherlock kept pushing, and pushing, when he really should have dropped it right there, should have just comforted John and been done with it.  But he didn’t.  John told him to stop, and he pushed through anyway.  He knew he’d done wrong the minute he saw John’s face, but it was too late to take it back, and Sherlock, being Sherlock, didn’t quite know how to fix it, so he just turned that anger on himself and the situation.

I think his anger in the lab, when he throws the microscope slide against the wall, is as much anger and frustration at himself, for where he took things with John earlier, just to prove a point, as it is frustration over not finding any trace of a drug in the sugar (which further underscored the fact that he pushed john that far for absolutely no reason at all).  

But, I agree with you that John needs to learn to speak up for himself, or that dynamic can go south fast.  Part of John not doing so may come down to his (I suspect) abusive upbringing.  He’s used to just taking the kind of treatment that undermines trust, and is used to making himself small, and to brushing things off and just getting on with it.  But he can’t keep doing that.  He really should have said, “That was not in any way okay!  Don’t you ever push me that far again, do you understand!”  

For lack of a better term, I don’t think that they have ever really set a ‘safe word’ with one another in this game they play (john doesn’t know his limits or when to say stop, he just let’s sherlock push him, even when it goes past what is bearable), and that is going to lead to trouble.  

TRF DEFINITELY broke trust, almost irreparably.  I do think that John felt he forgave Sherlock in TEH after the train car thing, and as weird as it may be to most people, the thing with the bomb really was a smart thing on Sherlock’s part.  He pushed John to the edge again, right to the edge, almost too far, but then he had that big ‘ta-dah!’ moment where he revealed that he had been in control all along, that he had a plan, that he had called the police.  It was Sherlock’s way of saying, “See, you can trust me.  I do have a plan.  We can go back to our play, I’ll give you the danger, the adrenaline rush, but I won’t ever push you that far, too far, again.  I will never make you feel that your trust in me was misplaced.  I’ve got you, John.  You’re safe with me.”

So John forgives him, and is willing to go back to their old dynamic, their old play, but there is still a part of him left bleeding, and that loops back again to the point I think you are trying to make here, that John forgave, truly forgave, but that the trust wasn’t fully repaired, even if they both thought it was.  It’s going to take a lot to fix that.

And remember, what does Sherlock turn around and do AGAIN in HLV?  He shuts John out, he lies to him to keep him safe, he makes his own plans with Magnussen, and he fails at those plans, and the result is John having to watch Sherlock go to his death all over again, as he is shipped off to Eastern Europe.  HLV was just TRF all over again.  Even if John had been starting to let himself trust again a little bit between TEH and his wedding, all of that started to unravel again in HLV.

I hate HLV, so much.  But then I think that is where Seasons 4 & 5 are going to have to take us, it’s what those seasons will have to address.  How on earth do you repair a breech of trust so huge, and especially with a man who came to the table with trust issues in the first place?!  

Sherlock and John have their work cut out for them, that’s for sure.

This is why I love HLV though. I think it’s actually a step in the right direction for them both, not a repeat of TRF. Sherlock doesn’t shut John out entirely. He doesn’t go off to confront Mary on his own. He doesn’t show up later and say, oh by the way your wife is the one who shot me, but it’s already been taken care of. He doesn’t put himself in yet another situation that might get him killed (because he knows that Mary isn’t going to shoot him with John there). Instead he asks John to trust him again. He puts John in that chair and says sit and listen, you need to be in on this, I want you to be part of this. John places an awful lot of trust in Sherlock to just sit there quietly while his wife aims a gun at him, a lot more trust than he probably has allowed himself to show since Sherlock came back really, but he does as Sherlock asked because he is allowing that trust between them to start to grow back to where it once was. And in doing so, it allows him to be in on all the secrets for once, to see that Sherlock trusts him, too. When Sherlock came back in TEH, he said he hadn’t been in contact because he was afraid John would let the cat out of the bag, and here in HLV he is literally opening the bag right in front of him and trusting John not to let the metaphorical cat escape. And that is a huge step in the right direction, and John even cements his regained trust in Sherlock in the domestic scene. “Your way. Always your way.”

Now we don’t know a lot about what happened before Christmas and how much of the CAM plan John was or wasn’t in on, so maybe that was a step backwards for them. But either way, I think that while Sherlock shooting CAM and subsequently getting sent off to Eastern Europe was obviously not something John would have wanted him to do, it isn’t really the same as TRF. Even in the midst of things, it was clear to John that whatever plan Sherlock had come in with, whether John was in on it or not, it had gone wrong. He was hoping Sherlock maybe had a backup plan (”Sherlock, do we have a plan?”), but Sherlock just closes his eyes and John knows he doesn’t. And so of course Sherlock improvises and does something drastic to try to get them out of it, to try to save John, but it isn’t the same as TRF because it wasn’t part of the plan. It’s shocking, yes. It’s likely the wrong choice, yes. But it wasn’t the huge betrayal of trust that TRF was because Sherlock didn’t intentionally manipulate him and lie to him about what was happening. Again, a step in the right direction. A small one, but one going the right way nonetheless.

I agree about Sherlock telling John that Mary shot him being a step in the right direction.  A huge step in the right direction, actually.  But, the only way I can see the Magnussen fiasco as not being another TRF, is if we find out in Season 4 that there was a plan all along, that Sherlock telling John that he could trust Mary during the 221b domestic was part of some deception that the two of them had arranged ahead of time, that John forgiving Mary was also a part of that deception, that there was some sort of mutual arrangement going on there, and that the thing with Magnussen was supposed to be the capping off of the whole plan, but for some reason went wrong.  

Thing is, that John seems truly, and sincerely shocked when Sherlock drugs his entire family on Christmas day, and a helicopter shows up to take them to Magnussen’s place.  John really seems to not have a clue what Sherlock’s got up his sleeve when they get there.  I really think it was all a huge surprise to John.  So, I don’t know…