Casuals: Why are your plots so complicated?
Moftiss: Omg, read a children’s book, we’re not feeding you warm paste.
TJLCers: Here are 7,000 plot inconsistencies found in your recent episode that make literally no sense because you never set them up and are also offensive to various different marginalized communities and your logic was faulty also I alphabetized them for your convenience.
Moftiss: Omg, it’s just a detective show.
Me: Sowhatisthetruth.gif

martinsaurus:

pasiphile:

This is long and ranty and basically an attempt at emptying my cache and just getting it out all out before starting on The Thing.

So. The Final Problem.

Keep reading

This this this! Honestly, not getting Johnlock would have been disappointing, but on some level I was prepared for that. But the writers promised to tell the story they’ve always been telling–and I expected the last episode to confirm what that story WAS. In my mind, it was the story of how Sherlock became a better person, a more human person–but at the end, all that is tossed aside because who he is “doesn’t matter”. Or it could have been about the relationship–in whatever form–between Sherlock and John, but again, this episode skipped over that in favor of action and “suspense,” not to mention giving the last speech of the show to Mary–a character only introduced halfway through the show, and who goes through so many variations of bad guy and good guy that the audience can’t help but feel almost nothing for her by the end, one way or the other.

I just…I don’t know what they wanted us to feel in this episode. I don’t see how it connects to anything outside of series 4 itself.

And their comments are what truly create outrage. Every tv show has bad episodes, lots even have unsatisfying finales. But to then tell the unsatisfied audience they’re just too stupid to get it? To claim there ARE no plot holes, even when they’re pointed out? It’s offensive on so many levels.

atikiology:

can we not do the thing where we say that people who don’t believe in the “obvious fourth episode” are idiots, can we also not do the thing where we call people insane and delusional for believing there might be more because there is no closure can we stop playing against one another in this really shitty situation when everyone’s just holding on and trying to cope in their own way

gloriascott93:

ghislainem70:

gloriascott93:

miadifferent:

glassofgaytea:

atikiology:

also. seriously. say the BBC wants to prevent their most successful show from having a queer ending (which was, hypothetically, the plan from the start) so they go to mofftiss and say, hey, calm those gays down and make them straight, and mofftiss are like, well ok then, now that we don’t get to do what we wanted, let’s wreck our own show to the ground. 

i’m going to be honest and say that this scenario is complete nonsense to me. 

if someone took your own work out of your hands, instead of murdering it and doing all your characters a disservice, AND spitting the thing you initially wanted to achieve (in this case LGBT representation) in the face to make sure to rub it really in. you’d just refuse to do that shit.

you can’t tell me that someone can force Vertue, Moffat and Gatiss to produce and write something they hate and then have Cumberbatch and Freeman act it out, fully knowing that it’s the opposite of what they signed up for. It’s not like those people don’t have other career opportunities you know. They are some of the most popular and hyped writers, producers and actors of our time. Someone forcing them to run their own project into the ground, a project they poured so much love and devotion (and, as i used to think, hope for a revolution) into is fucking ludicrous. I’m sorry but. If it had been their plan from the start and someone had told them “you don’t get to do it” they would have said “ok fuck you goodbye you don’t deserve the best show of the 21st century anyway.”

nah i’m telling you. they’re dead serious about this. 

exactly, and couldn’t they have taken their show to another network who would have allowed them to do it?

We’re so used to always defending them that is’t hard to break this pattern and finally hold them responsible for their actions. Unless they say otherwise, series 4 was their choice. 

Agreed.

Why in the hell would the BBC block that content?
It’s an absurd notion, they fucking celebrated Pride last year with a montage of all their LGBT content going back over 4 decades. Explicit queer content is nothing new on the BBC or on British TV generally. This argument is so nonsensical.

My local PBS station has very clearly not bought a 4th episode. The prime time Sunday schedule has the s2 premiere of a big budget PBS drama followed by Victoria.

I am going to take Moffat and Gatiss at their word. There are reviews aplenty out there now in which reviewers have called them on their now proven ongoing queerbaiting from the start. Moffat has continued their ongoing response of belittling and insulting fans’ intelligence without any embarrassment in person and to the press.

Deductive probable conclusion: there is no more rug pull.

Jenny and Vastra are it would seem enough for him. No need to do it in Sherlock.
There is in hindsight more evidence to suggest that the BBC were more open to a queer reading of the show than the showrunners. Vastly more.
Though why the BBC engaged in the s4 promo campaign they did is beyond me if they knew a queer story wasn’t what was being delivered.

In the end it came down to this:
They queer coded the show without intention to follow through.
They said they didn’t intend a queer ending.
We didn’t believe them. <—- there’s the mistake.
Why?
Because they wrote a heavily queer coded show.
There was no elaborate puzzle of codes. It was all coincidences and jumping to the wrong conclusions and being led astray by constant claims by them both that they always lie. Except that one time they didn’t:

When they said they were not trying to fuck with fans’ heads and there was no romantic endgame.

Many across this fandom, whether TJLC or like myself in some other corner, hoped they were trying to keep a lid on a surprise.

They weren’t. Or they were, but it was a psychotic evil sister locked in a tower.

That’s it. Accept it. Hate it. Be hurt by it. But please stop bargaining a better outcome by repeating the same mistake over and over.

Mofftiss made the show they wanted to make. Prior to this season’s ratings dip they sat at the top of the heap in BBC’s programming. They had the power to make the show they wanted to make, hugely inspired by TPLOSH. They queerbaited and used the romantic subtext to keep a certain audience segment’s interest, apparently– with the wholehearted support of the BBC marketing team and even the cast (“love conquers all,” BC SDCC 2016). But to be honest even at the lowest ratings for the series, we are only talking about what in sheer numbers is a small group amongst literally millions of viewers. It’s hard to see that much effort put into toying with a relatively minuscule portion of the viewership. The dedicated tumblr fandom they clearly see as delusional, shrill and angry females. They have no regard for the fandom’s mostly LGBT makeup, almost certainly again because we are (mostly) women. They are privileged white Establishment men who most certainly have little to no inclination to engage with a fandom they see as at best histrionic, and at worst potentially dangerous (a few fringe fans making death threats). Somebody brought up Stephen King’s Misery this morning, and I truly believe that is how Moftiss views us.

Now do I think the BBC will listen when thousands (hopefully) of outraged viewers write in to tell them how used, disappointed and disrespected (insert your own feeling here) they feel? Yes, I honestly think they will listen. It may give them pause in future. But the political and financial climate facing the BBC is challenging to say the least so I don’t see them, for example, renewing Sherlock with new cast and show runners, and making it explicitly gay. As for S5, if there is ever an S5, Mofftiss have made it clear that johnlock is not the story they’re telling. I for one don’t believe they would tell it in S5 even if BBC explicitly commissioned it. (I’d LOVE to be proven wrong). And I don’t think they would bow to fan pressure, outrage etc. because they have been aware of fandom’s (majority) desire for johnlock since S1 and it has never happened except in the brave acting choices of Ben and Martin. Because that’s not the story they wanted to tell, and they have said that publicly, and repeatedly. It’s up to us, and future creators who have the power to make popular media, to make it happen for ourselves.

I agree on the relative size of fandom point. Absolutely.

Well argued. Food for thought.

tisnotmydivison:

even if they didn’t love each other like we had wanted, even if they didn’t declare their love and kiss each other we still got what we wanted. they’re together forever,no irene no molly no Janine. Just Sherlock and John forever, raising Rosie with the other characters coming into their orbit, and they’ll love each other until the end of time. John and Sherlock are family, and even though we won’t get to see it, all those lustful stares across the room or awkward brushing of hands when they hand off the tea cups, they are there, and they are happening. Living together in their flat, knowing each other and loving each other exactly the way they should be. It’s just Sherlock and John together forever. We were right. Johnlock was endgame. 

do you remember when martin freeman said “sherlock is the gayest story in the history of television” years ago? i think he’s a little bitter now

norburylibrary:

hobbit-feels:

hisholmes:

hobbit-feels:

watsonshoneybee:

even Martin got queerbaited y’all

I saw that gif of him going around about TFP saying that them being friends is nice (with his mouth) while his face screamed something else.

He can be arrogant, to be sure, and sometimes I don’t know if he is taking the piss out of fandom (saying “it is what it is” about the johnlock fanart when the second half of that sentiment is “and what it is is shit” the first time John says it), but his face in that moment…

I think, for all the weirdness the leads have had about fandom and the drama Amanda kicked up about Johnlock on her Twitter, Martin would have really, dearly, truly loved to be the actor to go down in history as THE queer John Watson.  He knows his range, knows what he can do, and was ready and set to act the ever-loving hell out of a repressed Watson, finally coming out after all this time.  His acting choices for the last 7 years show him gearing up for this.  Hell, half the reason there ever WAS a Johnlock Conspiracy is because Martin made deliberate choices all along in the way he played John. 

Martin knew it would be talked about to death, analyzed in college classes, and probably would have showered him with praise and awards.  It would be historical in the way none of his roles so far have been. 

I do not have to stretch very far to assume Martin was disappointed it went in the other direction.

REBLOGGING THIS EVERY TIME I SEE IT TILL THE END OF TIME

Oh!  I found the gif I saw!  These are by @geek-royalty, can be found (and reblogged, hint hint) HERE

It does not take a tinfoil hat to see he’s not super jazzed about it.  Martin is an actor’s actor.  He has had many big, literary roles but this could have been HISTORIC and he knows it. 

Martin Freeman shares our pain and complete disappointment.