love-in-mind-palace:

busybiscute:

theirglassofteaat221b:

Besides the fact that Mary is an abysmal wife (I could go on for years about that point), John’s not the best husband, and their relationship was doomed from the start. Obviously we didn’t get to see every single aspect of their dating life, but in regards to the show, their entire relationship pretty much revolved around Sherlock.

John was deep in grief over Sherlock when they met, and it was heavily implied that working through that grief is what triggered them to start dating. John even semi-referenced his grief when he was proposing (usually people focus on the happy excitement not dead best friends).

Much of their engagement was spent with Sherlock, mostly John and Sherlock on cases because John wanted to escape the wedding planning. Not to mention Sherlock planned their wedding.

One month post wedding, when they should still be in full blown honeymoon phase, and getting ready for stupid accident baby (I still really hate that stupid baby, worst plot decision ever!), John is beyond grump and literally dreaming about running off on an adventure with Sherlock.

Immediately Mary’s lies start to be revealed, and John presumably moves in with Sherlock for MONTHS! He sure as hell doesn’t talk to his wife for months. And again, they should be prepping for the stupid baby.

John “forgives” Mary, moves back in with her, yet still seems to spend all of his free time with Sherlock, to the point that he ignores his phone and almost misses the birth of his stupid child. Even after the stupid baby comes, he’s at Baker Street. Remember when he made balloon John to keep Sherlock company when he was downstairs helping Mrs. Hudson with Sudoku? He’s not helping Sherlock with a case, you think he’d be at home with his beloved wife and spawn, but no, he’s doing number puzzles with his former landlady.

More of Mary’s lies are revealed and she ditches her husband and child (who those after her should be fully aware of), and even in her goodbye letter, she references Sherlock. Let’s not forget that John anticipated that she’d ditch them before Sherlock even confronted her (Sherlock and John always trusting each other), and he and Sherlock worked out a plan together.

Then we have her “tragic” death complete with a guilt trip, and she leaves the ridiculous DVDs telling Sherlock to nearly kill himself, and that since she’s gone they can become “what they’ve always been and were meant to be” (I’m paraphrasing)

And I didn’t even talk about how John conducted an emotional affair with Sherlock’s sister (perhaps because she subconsciously reminded him of someone?) when anyone else would have been in full on happy family, “we have a beautiful new child” mode.

TL;DR: If we were meant to root for John and Mary, why the fuck did they make their relationship such shit, and have John running to Sherlock at every possible opportunity?

SHOUT IT FROM THE ROOF TOPS LOUD FIR THE PEOPLE IN THE BACK

This..So much of this

Female Characters to Avoid in your Writing:  An Illustrated Guide.

thecaffeinebookwarrior:

1.  The Bella Swan (i.e. the blank sheet of paper)

image

Who she is:

In Twilight, Bella has absolutely no qualities that make her interesting as a character.  She’s shown to have very little personality, in the books or onscreen, and is only made “interesting” (a relative term here) via the inclusion of her sparkly, abusive boyfriend.  It feeds into the harmful mentality of adolescent girls that you need a significant other in order to find fulfillment, particularly if he’s significantly older and likes to watch you sleep.  Yikes.

Examples:

Bella is welcomed to school by a friendly, extroverted girl and given a place to sit amongst her and her friends.  Despite this girl’s kindness, Bella shrugs her off as a stereotypical shallow cheerleader, and spends her time staring wistfully at the guy across the cafeteria from them.  Once Edward becomes her official boyfriend, she immediately loses interest in her new friends as her life shifts its orbit to revolve completely around him. 

How to avoid her:

  • Female characters are allowed to have lives outside of their significant others.  They’re allowed to have friends, quirks, hobbies, and interests.  Give them some
  • The best fictional relationships are based off of characters who compliment each other, not one character who revolves around the other.  Make sure your female character’s life does not centralize around her significant other.
  • Strong female characters don’t look down on other girls, even if they are outgoing cheerleaders.  Being pasty and introverted doesn’t make you a better person, y’all – if it did, I’d be a decorated hero by now.
  • Give them aspirations besides getting an obsessive, much-older boyfriend.  In fact, don’t give them an obsessive, much-older boyfriend at all – if you do want them to have a significant other, give them one who cares about their interests and accepts that they have lives and goals outside of them.

2.  The Molly Hooper (i.e. the starry-eyed punching bag)

image

Who she is:

 Like most things about BBC’s Sherlock, Molly was an amazing concept that went progressively downhill.  I used to love her quiet tenacity and emotional intelligence, and was sure that with her strong basis as a character, she would overcome her infatuation with the titular Sherlock and find self-fulfillment.  Nope!

Examples: 

She remained stubbornly infatuated over the course of five years with an ambiguously gay man who, en large, treated her badly, leading to her public humiliation with zero pertinence to the plot or resolution.  Moreover, her infatuation with Sherlock quickly usurped almost all of her other characteristics, leading her to an increasingly immature characterization that was difficult to relate to.

How to avoid her:

  • By all means, please write female characters who are quiet, kind, and unassuming (a female character does not, contrary to popular belief, need to be rambunctious, callous, or violent to be “strong”) but remember than none of these traits need to make the character a pushover.  Let them stand their ground.
  • Similarly, attraction to men (or anyone, for that matter) does not invalidate a female character’s strength.  Just be sure she values herself more than their attention.
  • As I said earlier, don’t be afraid to make characters who are gentle and soft-spoken, but be wary of making them “childlike,” or giving them an infantile, emotionally characterization.
  • My best advice for writing gentle, soft-spoken, unassuming women would actually to look to male characters in the media fitting this description; since male characters are rarely infantilized as much as women are by popular media, you’ll get a much better idea of what a well-rounded character looks like. 

3.  The Irene Adler (i.e. the defanged badass)  

image

Who she is: 

Yup, another one of the BBC Sherlock women, among whom only Mrs. Hudson seemed to come through with her dignity and characterization intact.  In the books, Irene and Sherlock have absolutely zero romantic connotations, only bonded via Sherlock’s irritation and respect with her substantial intelligence.  In the show, it’s a different story entirely. 

Examples:  

Irene is a badass character who’s turned into a teary-eyed Damsel in Distress via her uncontrollable love for the show’s male lead.  It doesn’t help matters that she’s a self-proclaimed lesbian who falls in love with a man, which, unless you’re a woman who loves women yourself and writing about a character realizing she’s bi/pansexual, I would recommend against doing under any circumstances.  She ends up being defeated and subsequently rescued by Sherlock – a far cry from her defeat of him in the books. 

How to avoid her:

  • If you’re writing a badass female character, allow her to actually be badass, and allow her to actually show it throughout your work as opposed to just hearing other characters say it.  And one punch or kick isn’t enough, either:  I want to see this chick jump out of planes.
  • That said, “badass” does not equal emotionally callous.  It doesn’t bother me that Moffat showed Irene having feelings for someone else, what bothers me is how he went about it. 
  • When writing a character who’s shown to be attracted to more than one gender, just say she’s bisexual.  Pansexual.  Whatever, just don’t call her straight/gay depending on the situation she’s in.  Jesus.

4.  The Becky (i.e. the comedic rapist) 

image

Who she is: 

Most people who know me can vouch for my adoration of Supernatural, but it definitely has its problems:  it’s not as diverse as it could be, its treatment of women is subpar, and yes, there is some thinly veiled sexual violence:  all three of its leading characters have dealt with it at one point of another (Dean is routinely groped by female demons, a virginal Castiel was sexually taken advantage of by a disguised reaper, and the whole concept of sex under demonic possession is iffy to say the least.)  It’s rarely ever addressed afterwards, and is commonly used for comedic fodder.  Possibly the most quintessential example of this is Becky.

Examples: 

Becky abducts Sam, ties him to the bed, and kisses him against his will.  She then drugs him, albeit with a love potion, and is implied to have had sex with him under its influence. 

How to avoid her:

  • Male rape isn’t funny, y’all.  Media still takes rape against women a lot more seriously than rape against men, particularly female-on-male rape, and I can assure you its not.
  • Educate yourself on statistics for male sexual assault:  approximately thirty-eight percent of sexual violence survivors are male, for example, and approximately one in sixteen male college students has reported to have experienced sexual assault. 
  • Moreover, be aware that forty-six percent of all instances of male rape have a female perpetrator.
  • Read more here in this amazing article: http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2014/04/male_rape_in_america_a_new_study_reveals_that_men_are_sexually_assaulted.html
  • In other words, treat themes of sexual assault against men as seriously as you would treat themes of sexual assault against women.       

5.  The Movie Hermione (i.e. the flawless superhuman) 

image

Who she is: 

Okay, in and of herself, Movie Hermione is amazing:  she’s beautiful, intelligent, and heroic, as well as possibly the most useful character of the franchise.  She only bothers me in context of the fact that she takes away everything I loved most about Book Hermoine, and everything I loved about Book Ron, too.   

Examples: 

Book Hermione was beautiful, but not conventionally:  she had big, poofy curls, big teeth, and didn’t put a lot of effort into maintaining her appearance.  Movie Hermione looks effortlessly flawless, all the time.  Book Hermione was intelligent, but also loud, abrasive, and unintentionally annoying when talking about her interests (which meant a lot to me, because as a kid on the Asperger’s spectrum, I frequently was/am that way myself – it was nice to see a character struggling with the same traits).  She was also allowed to have flaws, such as struggling to keep up with academia, and being terrified of failure.  

Movie Hermione also took all of Ron’s redeeming qualities, and everything that made him compliment her as a couple:  his street smarts used to compliment her academic intelligence, for example, staying calm while she panicked in the Philosopher’s Stone when they were being overcome with vines.  He also stood up for her in the books against Snape, as opposed to the jerkish “he’s right, you know.”     

How to avoid her:

  • Allow your female characters to have flaws, as much so as any well-rounded male character.  Just be sure to counterbalance them with a suitable amount of redeeming qualities.  This will make your female character well-rounded, dynamic, and easy to get invested in.
  • There’s no reason for your female characters to always look perfect.  Sure, they can be stunningly gorgeous (particularly if their appearance is important to them), but it’s physical imperfections that make characters fun to imagine:  Harry’s scar and wild hair, for example.  Female characters are no different. 
  • If you’re writing a female character to have an eventual love interest, allow their personalities to compliment one another.  Allow the love interest to have qualities that the female character is lacking, so that they can compliment one another and have better chemistry. 
  • Basically, write your female characters as people. 

Check out my list of male characters to avoid here:   https://thecaffeinebookwarrior.tumblr.com/post/161184030785/male-protagonists-to-avoid-in-your-writing-an.

God willing, I will be publishing essays like this approximately every Friday, so be sure to follow my blog and stay tuned for future writing advice and observations!

soldierjhwatson:

totally-sherwholocked:

wssh-watson:

mikabee:

johnholmescouldwork:

sherlockfandomtandem:

mikabee:

CAN YOU BELIEVE

DID I JUST FUCKING READ WHAT I JUST FUCKING READ

FUCKKKKKK

ok but the fact that Sherlock did NOT originally go to Redbeard when told “Must be something in this ridiculous memory palace that can calm you down. Find it.” Redbeard came to him.

He went to John at first, and there’s several rooms of him, and each one was blocked by Mary.

But pls do remember that in none of the rooms Mary REALLY wanted to shoot him. She’s sorry “for that one time, really.” 💜

Also, she shot him nicely every time!

My heart broke and then I was salty AF, what the hell guys

@ discrepancies: when Mary travels around the world we see a flight list. And there are countries on it which do not exist anymore, like Western Germany and the Sovjet Union! A huge WTF in my opinion because this HAS to be deliberate!

inevitably-johnlocked:

possiblyimbiassed:

inevitably-johnlocked:

morgendaemmerung89:

inevitably-johnlocked:

(referencing this post)

@thesherlockexperiment Oh! Here one I haven’t seen yet, but I’m sure it was mentioned in your notes! 

Wow Nonny, shows you how much I know about geography 😛

Tinfoil hat me says that this could support “John’s Alibi/ Unreliable Narrator / John’s TAB” theory, since John himself probably is not up-to-date on his geography (Sherlock WOULD BE because of his time away, I would imagine). Hmm. 

Also Western Germany doesn´t exist since 27 Years! I mean…

somethings fucky

keepklainingon added: John is like that older relative in your family who keeps calling Russia ‘the USSR’ even tho they haven’t been that for more than 20 years

distantstarlight added: Well, this is very interesting. Noting it now.


YEP.

Maybe this has something to do with the ‘Ostalgia’ that Craig the hacker is referring to in TST? USSR and Western Germany both still existed in the eightees, when Thatcher was PM.

fellshish added: But they didn’t have the budget to buy new maps y’all

mervinede said: Out of curiosity I looked up the names of the places in those non-existent countries as well. All of them are real places except for one: the one called Nordenshlda, in the USSR. All the search results are in Russian and actually the top one is a sherlock discussion on LiveJournal, and one person said (translated by google) ”I wonder why Mary on the journey uses some ancient atlas in which the Nordenschild archipelago is recorded as “Nordenshlda (sic), Arkh., USSR“


@possiblyimbiassed Oh, Maybe! Never thought of that!

@fellshish *SNORTS* HAHHA YES

@mervinede Thanks for this info!

Wait, are you kidding me? 🙃

Mary doesn’t make sense

ravenmorganleigh:

furriesandus:

alexxphoenix42:

Mary doesn’t make any sense.

When all is said and done and the dust has settled after
series 4, I’m still left scratching my head over the character of Mary Morstan.
She just doesn’t make any sense to me.

If they made her a sniper, why wasn’t she a sniper connected
with Moriarty? That just made so much sense. WHY would a random ex-assassin
have been randomly working as a nurse in some clinic that John happened to be
working at by random coincidence.  IF she
were the sniper assigned  by Moriarty to
kill John it would have made so much more sense for why she was in John’s life
to begin with.

Why did Mary not recognize Sherlock when he showed up at the
restaurant? If she was a super smart spy type, she would want as much information
on John as possible when he entered her life. Either she was placed there to
watch John, or she stumbled on John but in either case, she would have Googled
what his ex looked like. Being completely surprised by Sherlock and not knowing
who he was would HAVE to be an act, and not a genuine response, and acting
surprised when she wasn’t would NEED to have a reason behind it.

WHY did Mary shoot Sherlock in series 3? It made no sense
and I kept waiting for some explanation – Moriarty was putting the pressure on
her to kill Sherlock, she was using him as leverage against Mycroft …  something. In the moment that Sherlock
surprised her, it made NO sense for her to shoot him. He was clearly an ally on
her side. She left Magnussen completely functional with yet MORE dirt on her.
It never made sense & they never explained it.

Why did Sherlock force his heart back to life because his
inner Moriarty told him John was in danger with “that wife” around? If Mary is
an ex-assassin gone good and is protecting John then he’s really not in any more
danger than he would be hanging around Sherlock.

Why was Mary suddenly Sherlock’s best friend in S4 when she
shot him for no reason and then threatened him in the hospital if he told John?
(And then later of course drugged him to run off and do secret spy shit on the sly.)
Why did Sherlock seem to prefer Mary to John in S4 as a working companion? Why
would he ever have reached a level to trust her?

Why would Mary have really jumped in front of a bullet to
kill herself in that dopey aquarium scene? If she could jump like that, she
could have just pushed Sherlock out of the way. It was a senseless sacrifice
that made no sense.

To say that Mary is a sympathetic character that the
audience is supposed to like is a bizarre whiplashy way of covering up all the
inconsistencies and frankly huge gaping holes that seem to make up her
character. They did a bad job of writing Mary and nothing anyone says at
Sherlocked USA is going to change my mind on that.

It seems that Mary is the writers favorite character or something. However, as far as I’m concerned the show I loved finished some time before they even thought of S4. Sorry about that. Agree that nothing they did with the character made sense which was why, since S3, people, most of who seem much more intelligent and inventive than the actual writers, spent so long trying to make it make sense. But I’d like to know why they did it. Why did they invent her to start with? Why? Also, why did they think fans like me would love her? To me they had a good thing and simply ruined it. 

Reblogging for last comment. 

thelostsmiles:

antisocial-otaku:

silentauroriamthereal:

Can someone direct me toward a post or two that talk about what Moftiss and them said at the con this weekend? Everyone on my dash seems to be talking about it, but I haven’t actually seen what was said anywhere. 

Thanks in hopeful advance! 🙂

About Mary  

Mary & their favourites

Low attendance

Mrs. Hudson & Mycroft

Garridebs

Johnlock

There you go 😀

^ *fist bump*