Still raging at the dying of he light….

myladylyssa:

tendergingergirl:

impossibleleaf:

welovethebeekeeper:

iwantthatbelstaffanditsoccupant:

welovethebeekeeper:

Well the comments from the US con CONFIRMED that the creators were queerbaiting. They state they had no intention of writing a romance, yet their product proved otherwise. They clearly were WELL AWARE of the growing johnlock fandom by s2, and could have redirected the show very easily in s3. However they chose to give us a clearly gay Sherlock and a pining, regretful bi John. S3 was overt, convinced many casuals that Sherlock was gay and in love with John, and set up expectations of John’s marriage breaking down and the possible romance of the two leads. If people didn’t see this in s3 it was a choice not to see it.

Sadly we are not at a point in our LGBTQ visibility as to where the uproar would be heard via the media (we tried) it appears that the LGBTQ press and advocacy agencies have a prejudice against fandoms. Nothing new there, we have battled that constantly for decades. The BBC closed ranks and defended their show, ignorant of any of the facts and refusing to consider our complaint. As a publicly funded organisation, I say Shame on You BBC! 

However, for our own sanity, our wellbeing, we need to move on. It’s a confirmed reality what the creators did in this show, and we learn from it and try to prevent it occuring in the future. Extensive post mortems on the dichotomy of what was delivered on screen versus what the creators have said is futile. They have chosen to opt for revisionist history of their show. End of. We need to see academic papers on why the creators could still deliver a clearly queerbaiting top drama show and get away with it, we need discussion forums in the LGBTQ   Community to examine this issue. And we need fandom studies to carry on with the question of female fandom visibility and worth.

I firmly believe Ben played Sherlock as gay and in love with John. I also firmly believe, and praise, Martin Freeman for giving us a John in love, confused and repressed due to how the character was written, but still desperately in love and  craving physical intimacy with Sherlock. THAT my friends must have been a tough endeavour to carry off under the nose of the showrunner. I believe Martin is as disgusted as we are over s4. I believe any further Sherlock projects will be a hard sell to Martin, and thus Ben. They remain my heros, for their portrayals of Sherlock and John they desearve all our respect. 

I have said this before, but– I have never seen greater indication that the show’s writers/producers and their actors were never on the same page. Their poor communication skills rival their Sherlock and John’s.

There have been quotes from the beginning about Benedict asking for backstory information..something any decent actor will do (and he is a fantastic actor), and having it be denied him. Or belittled that he should need to ask. And the fiasco regarding having Amanda play Mary while being deliberately misled.

The result: the actors formed their own headcanon as best they could. And it was accurate. But the script seemed to never be in synch with it as it morphed and they struggled to make it coherent.

I can’t imagine working with such poor feedback. Or such a random process. Or having the author change my entire backstory ( not just Mary’s but Sherlock’s as well)

Yes…I write on the fly, because I am a lazy writer and I am a complete amateur. I don’t plan things through well because, frankly, it is my hobby, not my dayjob, nor am I the presumably well-paid lead writer on a show that is watched by the world. People warned me about these guys, and I didn’t know better.

But I will always love this show because of the actors and the character’s hearts…no matter what ridiculous curves they were thrown.

It’s an excellent sandbox for fic writers. Pick and choose from it as you will to move the creative process forward. But I never imagined two men who loved Holmes and Watson as much as I did would stray this far for little reason except adding action scenes, physical abuse, and cheap repressed-memory drama.

Great comment!

The queerest thing (ah!) about the whole thing is that, if they’ve never intended to turn subtext into text, then we have screenwriters with split personalities.

The problem about Sherlock’s handling of this is the exact opposite of Doctor Who where:

  • Moffat insured that Jenny and Vastra were the ‘real’ Dr. Waston and Sherlock Holmes, two married lesbians;
  • Moffat created a lesbian companion telling everyone who wants to listen, ‘It’s not a matter of being praised, the correct thing to say should be What took you so long?”’

Gatiss who supposedly tries to bring more LGBT representation and who told people again and again how TPLoSH shaped his writing and how he’s always realized that Sherlock was in love with Watson but it remained desperatedly unspoken.

We also have appaently Moffat telling us rebooting a story should only be done if you want to correct an injustice.

We’re at a crossroad where we need to seriously consider that they have double-standards. Like, serious double-standard, mythomania and split personality.

For how great Ben and Martin are, they can’t get away with rewriting the script. Mofftiss let them play their characters like that.

I do believe there is hubris at work, every author literally plays God when they write so that’s nothing new. But this time I don’t think they should get away with that.

It’s okay to move on, I understand perfectly. We should move on.

But as long as authors get away with this, as long as we let them, it will inevitably happen again because this is a scam and they will always be able to walk away.

I so agree. Like someone mentioned yesterday, they turned the whole atmosphere surrounding the show toxic for Queer people, young and old, and it’s also true, that those two are working on another project together. My stomach turns just thinking about what they might butcher next. It may sound petty, but I don’t want them hired as writers, or entrusted with any more show running. They simply can’t be trusted.

I am writing about this academically, presenting a version next month, still working through all this. My head spins.

thelostsmiles:

antisocial-otaku:

silentauroriamthereal:

Can someone direct me toward a post or two that talk about what Moftiss and them said at the con this weekend? Everyone on my dash seems to be talking about it, but I haven’t actually seen what was said anywhere. 

Thanks in hopeful advance! 🙂

About Mary  

Mary & their favourites

Low attendance

Mrs. Hudson & Mycroft

Garridebs

Johnlock

There you go 😀

^ *fist bump*

All I’m hearing through the din of Sherlocked chatter is that Mofftiss are mediocre writers. Blaming the continuity errors and poorer quality of shots on a low budget is one thing. But when the plot of an entire season and the characters in it make no sense whatsoever…that’s a tad bit more than the budget. That’s the backbone of the whole show, the writing. If the writing sucks everything else crumbles with it. Even with amazing award winning actors.

Clarifying

friskykatt:

Obv. I shortened the answers just to be concise, but I’ll expand on a few things that people are wondering about:

Skull pic – Mark was absolutely sincere talking about this, and this was a VERY casual fun setting (he’s quite charming and fit irl!). First he explained how the original artist was charging loads of cash to use his print, and they decided enough of that. They had Arwel make a skull, which was a print over a light box (blah blah lil pics of ACD, you’ve heard that before). When shot however, the other lights would hit it – did he say “oddly”? I forget the exact word. It would look too glaring, and like a postage stamp stuck on the wall (pantomimes that). So they changed it. Original question girl follows up “you turned it down?” And Mark replied “no, no, it was done in post” and a comment that “there’s really nothing more to it”

Budget: Mark and Sue both talked about how Sherlock was a huge hit, people think they are rolling in dosh ($) to get them made, but it’s the BBC, and it’s just not that way. Sue made a quip about how she’s the boss, but it’s not all in her hands (paraphrasing there – I have an excellent memory for dialogue, so most of this you can take as quite accurate). Arwen described drawing the “bond lair” – his words- and showing them the pics and then pantomimed jaw dropping astonishment from the team. He followed up with talking about how such a huge set was difficult to bring in on budget. In all the talks of $ there was a slight note of bitterness, or disbelief. SLIGHT note, they are British, but definitely there. I’m very sure they weren’t making it up.

Lights- I was unclear earlier on what Arwel said – he talked at length that there were 3 sets and a location every time they went down the stairs, so you’re literally seeing 2 different ceiling lights because you’re seeing two different sets. I mushed it up with the skull stuff earlier, sorry. He also spoke about how hard they try for continuity, but stuff just gets lost, and “every time you hand an actor a prop, they break it” and followed with a funny anecdote about Eccles and (forget) both IMMEDIATELY broke their first sonic screwdriver.

I’ll have more tonight for you hopefully! Glad I can share stuff with you. Do you wanna see more pics or is that boring?

I’m convinced that Mofftiss don’t see John as an equal to Sherlock. They don’t care about his backstory, his established characterization in the books or what he’s capable of doing. It is the biggest crime in adaptation history.

thelanding:

impossibleleaf:

inevitably-johnlocked:

mysteryandtea:

inevitably-johnlocked:

Yeah, I’m starting to think that as well Nonny, especially since they literally replaced his role as the storyteller with Mary. And HEY guess whose backstory we got instead? Mary. And guess who took over John’s (and essentially Sherlock’s) role as partner / detective? Mary. Like I feel like they decided Mary was indeed more important than John ever was. AND it’s even more frustrating for me because they WERE building Mary up to be an exciting villain, and instead made her a terrible plucky … whatever the hell they ruined her to be. Bleh. I fear that they really DON’T value the Holmes/Watson dynamic. Which is so bizarre given what we had pre-S4, because it WAS all about their relationship, even when Mary was there. So I don’t get why suddenly John was relegated to a side character and Mary had more screen time dead than John did in all three eps. *sighs*

It’s especially weird because Moftiss did interviews where they basically said that the John/Sherlock friendship was the heart of all the Holmes stories and why the stories are so popular. So why they would suddenly do essentially a 180 on that, I have no idea. My only explanation for S4 at this point is “2016 was a slow slide into an alternate universe & also affected Moftiss’s brains” lol.

LOL, yeah. That’s why I was so confused too. Their relationship is so important to them that they felt they had to tear it apart, it makes no sense at all.

I’m barely joking when I say that Mary is a virus. She’s infected the story and made herself essentiel by taking the place of another (John).

She is John in TST, that’s the whole point and reason why she and John are OOC.

The only part she’s failed is that Sherloc doesn’t listen to her when they’re with Norbury and that’s why he died: he didn’t listen. And even that, Sherlock will ignore Vatican Cameo in TFP.

We can say without much sacarsm that they could have killed John instead and we wouldn’t have seen the difference.

I mean, wouldn’t that have been perfect?

Mary is:

  • a nurse where he was a doctor;
  • a former assasin where he was a soldier;
  • someone Sherlock wants to protect;
  • his conductor of light in TST;
  • the one telling him how to act with people;
  • the one telling their story;
  • a Watson.

It’s always Sherlock Holmes and Dr Watson to the audience, so what if it’s Mary and not John? Mary is better, John is a cheater, wouldn’t that have been karmic justice? She is loyal, not him! As she’s a woman, Moffat could make her seek comfort with Sherlock and voila! Your Holmes/Watson you so desperatedly craved, you sick shippers.

It’s insiduous, but Mary has destroyed John without even killing him.

That’s why we need to go back to a John’s POV, immediately. He needs his journey to find himself again and take his place in the Circle of Life in the story back.

crying nervously

whereisjawn:

loveinthemindpalace:

mr-brightside24:

love-in-mind-palace:

shortangrybisexual:

love-in-mind-palace:

Remember when the masterpiece episode (Read TFP) leaked TWICE and then every official Sherlock thing was actually promoting that by telling us not to watch……………………………Did I dream all of that?

Remember when Mofftiss said TFP was the best episode they’ve ever written and they’re incredibly proud of it?

I have receipts 

Remember when they didn’t even submit the episode they were ‘so proud of’ for the emmies??

Remember when we all collectively became very very sad and disappointed