SteMo is NOT the person responsible for the 57 reference in the DW episode ‘The Shakespeare Code’
This was before his tenure as showrunner when RTD was the person who was in charge. And Gareth Roberts was the writer of this episode. That doesn’t mean it’s not a bisexuality reference and a DW reference and honest I love SteMo but let’s not give him credit for stuff he hasn’t done. DW existed before The Moff.
Okay okay okay hold the phone. Slow down Steven. Did anyone pick this up after Moffat’s comment…..was it at the London Sherlocked?? And it was to a fan or something? He said that “Mary shot Sherlock nicely.”
Blink, DW season 3, 2007, written by Steven Moffat…
“DOCTOR: Fascinating race, the Weeping Angels. The only psychopaths in the universe to kill you nicely….
….No mess, no fuss, they just zap you into the past and let you live to death. The rest of your life used up and blown away in the blink of an eye. You die in the past, and in the present they consume the energy of all the days you might have had. All your stolen moments. They’re creatures of the abstract. They live off potential energy.”
THEY ZAP YOU INTO THE PAST (Forwards or backwards? Backwards! Into the past (symbolically i mean….the past where society required the platonic version of johnlock). Mary did that when she “shot him nicely”. THEY LET YOU LIVE TO DEATH. She sent him “back” to live out his days, like the final TFP montage shows. Stolen moments. That sounds familiar. The rest of Sherlock’s life, used up and blown away. Send help.
STEVEN.
Jesus.
Clues like this make me hope that the writers are really careless and not connecting things in their own writing. Because this would be a horrible thing to do to their own characters even metaphorically. And yet it seems that Sherlock and John are getting hit really hard both on the screen and beneath the surface. Free them!
You know something I don’t know. You know who the next Doctor is. At least, I think that will be out by the time you read this. Old Chibs (as he must always now be known) is playing his cards close to his chest, and won’t tell me a thing. I attempted to give him some sage advice on the subject of secrecy, but he gave me a look, as if to say, “Seriously, have you checked your own record on this??” and had me removed by security. Again. But it’s comfy here, in my skip in the Roath Lock car park, and Russell is good company. When we’re both not crying, that is.
Actually, I’m not comfy at all. I’ve got everything crossed. Can Old Chibs pull it off? Can we actually have a new Doctor that’s a proper surprise, the way it’s supposed to be? I do hope so! But you know all that by now, out there, in the glorious new dawn.
And the fact is, I have no more news for you. Barely any secrets to keep. One more Special on Christmas Day, and I’ll be gone before the end credits. A brand-new team will go blazing into action, and in the far future, vast new Andrew Pixley Archives will form in the void.
But frankly, even I don’t care about me – this is all about Peter Capaldi. I saw him at the end, you know. The very last shot you see of him as the Doctor is in fact (brilliant scheduling by amazing producer, Pete Bennett) the very last thing Peter did on the show. Just as popping out the TARDIS and confusing Strax was the very first thing he did in Deep Breath, all those centuries ago. Since then he’s faced down a Mummy on the Orient Express, talked down a Zygon war using a couple of empty boxes, punched a wall for four and a half billion years, misunderstood the romantic intent of a puddle, decked a racist, insulted Santa, had a 24-year date in a restaurant, and played gooseberry when Missy met herself. He’s been gentle and fierce and rude and kind, and now with a wave of his hand and a flap of his cuff, he’s striding into the sunset to give it a piece of his mind. Be there for him on Christmas Day – Scotland’s finest in his final hour. He’ll break your heart and save your galaxy, all over again.
It was funny, that last day. I was in the studio for most of it, which is the first time I’ve ever managed that on Doctor Who. Normally, there’s so much else to do – new season to plan, new scripts to write, new stars to find. But now, with my time on the show winding down, with desks falling empty, and computers falling silent, and endless rounds of goodbye drinks, there’s nowhere else for me to be.
Brian Minchin is here today. And we sit and laugh and chat, and marvel at Peter’s extraordinary final performance. Every take is different and beautiful in a new way, and how the hell are we supposed to choose just one? It’s not goodbye to Brian, I’m delighted to say – he’s joining me and Sue at Hartswood Films, and we have dark and mighty plans. Rachel Talalay, our finale specialist, is directing. She’s come back to see number 12 off into the shades but I very much hope she’ll be directing more Doctor Whos in the future. She keeps hinting that she won’t, though.
“You’re already directing the new one – you’re doing the regeneration!” “Yes, but apart from that.” “You probably know who the new Doctor is, and everything!” “No, I don’t” “You had a secret dinner with Matt Strevens and Old Chibs!” “It wasn’t secret!” “Well, I didn’t know about it.” “No-one thought to tell you, it was just for people who are… you know…” “What?” “Involved.”
I was alright after a bit, and the nurse with the oxygen was very nice.
“Who’s the new Doctor?” I demanded to know from my stretcher, mostly in hand signals. “I don’t know,” lied Rachel, probably. “Just the initials.” “I don’t know.” “Will you tell me if I cry?” “You’re already crying.” “… Would you like ten pounds?”
There’s another goodbye coming up – and frankly it’s right here. My old friend, the wise and kind King of Numbers himself, Tom Spilsbury, is leaving this magazine. It’s funny, we’ve done almost everything in parallel in Doctor Who. He was assistant editor on the mag, while I was an occasional writer for Russell’s era. He became editor only shortly before I became showrunner. And now, at the end, we’re tumbling out the door together. We’ve tumbled out of quite a few doors together, but I’m damned if I’m telling you which pubs. Once a month, for so many years, Tom would remind me that this column was due. No, that’s a lie. He’d remind me several times a month. Towards the end, in a very high voice, with crying. Well, no more! These days are over. Tom’s entirely brilliant era of DWM is drawing to a close with every word you read, my time on Doctor Who is vanishing like breath on a mirror, and this column too is about to pop out of existence.
It’s funny how things you take for granted just disappear, isn’t it? That school you went to every day and then never go back to, that friend you part from laughing and never see again, all those doors that click behind you without you knowing they’re closing forever. I first wrote Doctor Who in 2004, and I very much hoped I’d get to write it again. Then I wrote more, and then so much more, until I thought it might go on forever. I remember at some awards dinner, telling Brian I loved my job so much I couldn’t imagine ever stopping. In other more melancholy moments I knew that everything ends and wondered what the very last words I’d ever write about Doctor Who would be. Well, the time has come, and here they are.
Let’s get this straight for all the people spouting inaccuracies. I wanted to just celebrate Jodie, but I can’t stomach the misinformation.
1. Steven Moffat was not fired from Doctor Who. He is stepping down from the show if his own volition.
2. Steven Moffat has been paving the way for a woman Doctor for ages, writing passages in support of it in official Who content as early as the 90s. He has since cast the first woman Master and shown a white man regenerate into a black woman, as well as has written Doctor-like women leads like River Song and Clara Oswald, the latter of whom even got her own TARDIS.
3. His writing of this has had a tangible impact on increasing support for a woman Doctor. In the aftermath of the reveal if Michelle Gomez as the Master in 2014, for example, fan site DoctorWhoTV found support for a woman as the Doctor increase from 13% to 46.47%. Subsequent use of Missy and other characters fitting that subtext has further increased support over the past few years.
Jodie Whittaker as the Doctor is an absolute triumph. Seriously, huge kudos to Chris Chibnall for that. But don’t act like Moffat has been getting in the way of this. No matter how you feel about him as a writer, he played an important role in getting us to this point.
“I like that Helen Mirren has been saying the next doctor should be a woman. I would like to go on record and say that the Queen should be played by a man.”
— Steven Motherfucking Moffat, Everyone
I was actually happy about today but then I saw this revisionist bullshit on my dash and honestly I’m a good person and I don’t deserve this.
(long meta post is long as fuck so the rest is under the cut)
Alright guys, I asked Mark and Steven about Garridebs!
Mark, very sincerely and personably (make of that what you will), agreed with me about the moment’s emotional importance, and expressed that he had really hoped to include the scene. He said that they (I can’t remember his wording exactly) either tried it or he ran through some possible scenarios and it wouldn’t have fit anywhere (this depends on the different opinions of “was Johnlock intended to be fulfilled or not”). He mentioned the writing phenomenon of “kill your babies” when saying how much he wanted to do the scene. He even called it “throttle the nursery” because it was such a big blow to him.
Steven said that there have been plenty of scenes where Sherlock and John’s care for each other has been shown (his exact emphatic words were “yes yes they would just say wow this is my favorite person!”) and so the Garridebs scene would not be a revelation of that care, as it was in the novels in Victorian times. He said the moment itself is “a retelling of The Red Headed League, but not as good”. I could tell that this is a question he’s been asked before or has thought on a lot, because he delivered the answer very straightforward and with an air of, he’s tired of explaining this and finds it very obvious.
So, interpret all this however you want, I mean shit I still have my strong opinions in this. But I’m just very glad to have been able to ask them both, and in a more private and informal setting, and actually get answers.
I asked Moffit if I can be in series 5 and he said, “We don’t even know if there’s going to be a series 5” and I gave him a knowing look and said, “But there’s gonna be a series 5.” And he nodded and said, “Yeah, probably.”
I didn’t realize people would be so salty about my brief convo with Steven about Mary. I prefer Mary to be evil cuz I think it’s more logical and hella more interesting, but to me it’s their show, they do what they want. Anyways, here’s the whole exchange while I remember it.
Me: do you think Mary was redeemed in the end, or was she still morally dubious?
Steven, surprised: well I don’t think she was morally dubious at all!
Me: uhh she did shoot Sherlock…
S: but she did it nicely, it was surgical. She was stuck in a difficult situation. If Sherlock didn’t mind it, why should we?
Me: so you think she was redeemed by her ending?
S, slightly frustrated with me: she didn’t need redemption, it’s not a scorecard. She had such a tougher background, so her movement towards humanity means more than …Sherlock is also, but he’s getting there, and John is solidly (for humanity, something like that I forget the wording, he rambled a bit, Mary took a bullet for Sherlock etc. )But she’s dead now, and there’s not a scorecard for that. It’s not black and white.
Me: ok, thanks for your time.
Sigh.
Moff’s emotional intelligence, understanding of relationships, of the natural consequences of one’s actions, and knowledge of the way to influence and impact your audience with your writing seems to be really low…
I mean even Amanda was tweeting stuff like, “Mary is a fucking psychopath”. Granted Amanda says a lot of stuff on Twitter for strokes, but like I think it’s fair to say that even she thought Mary’s arch was either going to turn out a little differently than it did, and/or felt that some of Mary’s actions in TST qualified her for ‘fucking psychopath’ status.
Also, if you set a character up to a) come between the protag and his love interest, and b) have them shoot the protag, and c) have that protag claw his way back to life just to save his love interest, and then d) have that character threaten to murder him again if he causes her to lose the man they both love, it’s only logical that an audience will assume that that character is meant to be viewed as villainous, or at the very least a clear danger and obstacle to your protag’s happiness and wellbeing.
And yet Moffat seems incapable of comprehending this? The mind boggles…
So if you have a tough background and are in a tight spot, it is ok to shoot someone? I’m sure law enforcement will be happy to let you go once you explain the circumstances. I really feel sorry and maybe even a little worried for Sue to be married to a man who thinks these things. In what universe would Sherlock be ok with being shot, going through months of pain, suffering and rehab. What if Mary had shot John because she was in a tight spot. Would that have been fine? Truly, this is a man who has absolutely no understanding of consequences of actions.
Both John and Sherlock began the BBC AU keeping secrets from the writers:
Secrets Sherlock kept from the writers:
He was ALWAYS a GOOD MAN
He knew and accepted his sexual identity. He didn’t need anyone to help him on that journey. He is on the demisexual scale and was content to wait for the person that would spark his interest. He wasn’t a volcano, or a late developer, or a man who choose celibacy. And his sexuality was not a game to exploit
His heart cannot die, be burned out of him, it just suffers eternally, always in the hope of finding a safe harbour someday with John Watson
At the end of the BBC AU, he knew that the writers had betrayed him. They had used his John as the weapon and given his enemies, Moriarty and Morstan, a free pass to write his story.
He knew the game, his game, his raison d’etre, was compromised and over by the time TLD began. He was in fact a dying detective yet again
Secrets John kept from the writers:
He IS the wisest man
He was gay, just in the closet. Always has been since he was created
He never wanted a child, or a wife. All he ever wanted was Sherlock Holmes
He loved being the narrator, he NEEDED to be the narrator
John’s reactions to tedious and annoying things about Sherlock, the words and responses created for him by the writer, missed the point that he adored every single thing Sherlock said or did. He never was an apologist, he was always a devotee
He knew he was killed in the BBC AU at the end of HIV. [TAB just a glorious moment during the throws of death] The John of s4 was the vestige regret, anger and sorrow, not directed at Sherlock, but at the creators for failing once again
It was HIS heart that got burned to a crisp, not by Moriarty, but by the writers
He ALWAYS knows far more than the creators writing the story. Sadly he knew the mistakes being made in the BBC AU and the inevitable outcome
He and Sherlock running out of Rathbone Place was in fact them running as fast as they could from this mess of an AU called BBC Sherlock
Maybe in future incarnations the characters will find justice, resolution and ultimate happiness.