Mark: “I’m sure there are lots of mysteries on twitter.”
Steven: “Oh yes.”
From here. They’re talking about the #SherlockLive thing and how Sherlock could use twitter to find cases…@toxicsemicolon@teapotsubtext if this is both about the Eastenders ‘mistake’ and some…mysterious… twitter accounts aaaaaaaaah
FUCK YOU GUYS!!!! LIKE !! FUck you guys. .. i know but i don’t Know and a sldhf;alskdf i am disgusted
come make these shit eating grins to my face, messers. bonch
what cracks me up is they’re like “”we didn’t do anything”” then **shot of mark on twitter and then both of them on their phones**
This was posted by the ContactSH twitter a few hours ago, and it just hit me after a random thought and I’m not a Londoner, but I’ve been there and isn’t this the exact view from the BBC Broadcasting House?????
Even the angle fits, because we can see the London Eye in the background. I don’t think someone not working for the BBC or with the BBC could get that picture, right????
Excuse this, if someone already mentioned it.
Tagging some people under the cut, because otherwise I would scream into the void.
The Inspire Pro is listed as part of BBC’s aerial photography fleet!
This is the image of it from the front:
I am almost positive that this is the same bird that is shown above.
Note, I know the front lights are red but it is normal for drones. Red lights are warning lights from the front to let people know the bird is headed towards them.
After reading this postI’ve been investigating a bit cause that photo was haunting my soul. And, in my opinion, it could only be done from the BBC building. i am gonna explain why.
– This is the photo on that twitter. We see the clock in that tower thing, and that semicircular building at right. Keep that in mind.
– The photo could be taken from this 4 places. Place 3 and 4 are impossible because from 3 we couldn’t see the semicircular building. and 4 doesn’t match the clock view from the tower.
– So, 1 & 2 (which is BBC) I initialy though it was taken from 1, but I used google Maps a bit more and saw this:
– The building attached to that round tower is shorter so we couldn’t get that clock perspective, clearly from higher a place. So I think it’s from the BBC, exacly from spot 2. Also if you look at the first pic (the twitter one) you can see at left a wall with a pattern that looks exactly like this one in the BBC.
Please let me know if you think it was taken from any other place and why. This is driving me crazy. I am 99% sure it’s from the BBC building.
Signal boosting for less drunker folks to look at and figure out.
Spot two is in fact the only place you could get the shot from.
But- doesn’t ContactSH canonically own a drone? This picture could easily be taken by a drone. I’m not sure of London’s drone laws however, so whether or not this would be allowed- I don’t know. It is however another possibility.
Though to slightly counter my own point, he does immediately tweet after “I’m not going to jump”, so the Sherlock associated with the acc is canonically on the building, however, the person behind the acc may not have been.
I’m sharing this on both my Granada blog and main blog because I feel people need to be aware that this happened (I was not previously aware Rachel was doing this).
For those who do not already know, a reminder that Rachel Talalay is the person who directed Sherlock Season 4.
The fact that she has been supporting anti-Johnlock blogs on Tumblr is further proof that there were people in BBC One (including the writers) who really were against Johnlock happening. Yes, they really did treat lgbt like a “Joke” and very intentionally.
Yes they really did do that to season 4, it really did happen, there is no Johnlock plan and no they are not sorry.
Granted the way both BBC and the writers systematically reacted to the audience with the rudeness, attempts at erasure and generally dismissive attitudes was warning as it was, but this information really nails the coffin in for me.
There is no secret episode and they really did trash the show as badly as they did with the complete and utter disrespect and belittling of the Garridebs moment as well as the rest of the sexist and heternomative bs.
yeah part of the reason I stopped watching Sherlock is because I knew deep down that Johnlock was just going to be queer baiting and this unfortunately confirms it
“keep up” bitch shut up I don’t watch the show anymore so I’m not exactly following all the news about it and forgive me for believing that a ship was used as queerbait when its the norm for writers to do that in most tv and movies
You follow it enough to reblog something with a comment LONG after the original post was disproven. In fact, had you checked the comments on the post you reblogged you would have seen it. You don’t have to be actively following it to do that.
I delved deep into my archived messages. I am one of the people in the above thread and included that alleged Rachel Talalay tweet in one of my posts. It was during some discussions with and about the blog tjlc-we-need-to-talk (set up by scr1ptscr1bbles), and the ‘answer’ from Rachel Talalay was on their main site scr1ptscr1bbles. Afterwards, this happened:
I deleted it to my knowledge, but of course the reblogs exist. I am usually not for sharing messages, but I wasn’t asked to keep them to myself and now I feel it might shed some light on the issue.
With @dymm contacting Rachel Talalay and her stating that these are not her words, the whole issue starts to get very fishy. I now believe that scr1ptscr1bbles intentionally manufactured this reply but then got afraid that their fraud might spread and therefore asked me to delete my post containing it.
I tried to check it back then and it looked genuine to me, but I’m surely not an internet buff.
This is playing really dirty imo because it discredits third parties just for the sake of looking to be right. Sorry to everyone involved.
And shame on you scr1ptscr1bbles! Even if you asked me to delete it and perhaps understood that you went too far – you shouldn’t have done this in the first place. You were not just an idiot, but mean – to fans and Rachel Talalay. Because you never confessed that you fabricated that message, but instead evoked the impression that you wanted to protect people when you were just lying though your teeth.
Lesson learned – at least by me.
I was really upset by the message and I really wish people would STOP MESSING AROUND with the Johnlock fandom. As if what BBC and writers did was not bad enough, people do not need to trying to mess with upset people on top of that.
I REALLY appreciate that Rachel Talalay was nice enough to speak out and debunk this and am glad it is being shared around.
I am VERY thankful to @isitandwonder for keeping us in the loop and letting us know (I had deleted the reblog that included my first response this morning after I found out it was faked and shared Rachel’s response.)
Also, @whimsicalethnographies, the above post was in response to a blog that was shared on my feed yesterday morning, and was disproven by that afternoon from someone sharing the proof otherwise to me. I had since deleted the earlier response so as to try to prevent any further spread of the falsified quote. Your implication of the post being ‘old’ is full of shit. There are no dates on these blogs (in case you completely and utterly fail to notice). It looked to be new information (it was certainly new to me) and shared as such. So stuff it with your implied negative attitude that those of us responding to the news were in any way doing anything was intentional or malicious because it is quite literally bull.
We have VERY valid reasons to be upset. We have no actual proof that a 4th episode exists yet. None… just speculation. And then on top of what happened in the show itself, BBC attempted erasure by the way it treated complains and then not reporting on it (while reporting on the few dozen ATY received) and the writers have been explicitly rude in their responses to female Johnlockers.
Now consider all of this, and then seeing the OP with no indication that it was faked (until afterwards). Yes. Seeing that is going to be upsetting (especially as, as far as we knew, it was true information). You are being incredibly rude and out of line.
Instead of being rude to people, you can TRY being understanding on exactly why we were upset, be understanding of those who did not know the post was fake and responded as such, and why we would be skeptical of anything else coming out when nothing from -bbc itself- has yet to indicate any intent to offer a fourth episode to fix the forced heteronormative coding that was pushed in TFP.
People have VERY valid reasons to be skeptical… and then to see something like this with no indication that it was faked, it ends up being tip of the iceberg. Yes, she said it was faked and I am relieved, but that was not shared until after the original post was shared. So enough with being catty and bitchy to bunt-out johnlockers who are upset enough as it is FOR GOOD REASON and you can just take a seat.
They reblogged the post AFTER many of us made comments about it. You can’t see time but you can see order. Conveniently, so many have deleted the originals by now it’s fucky, many without explicitly saying they were wrong (I know you did acknowledge it). So, that “no time” is pseudo evidence bullshit. Guess I’m gonna have to start screen shotting everything when I reply to it.
I get people are upset and angry, but if half of us are expected to take a second and think rationally, everyone else needs to as well. This was clearly bullshit from a known bullshit spreader who you know wants to hurt you. Thank goodness Dymm actually asked.
Also, you literally jump on random posts to be salty and act as if you’re the only rational adult in the room, so you don’t get to play “staying in line” especially when I admittedly saltily pointed out it was disproven (in the same tone many of us have experienced from you), and was called a bitch.
Have a good day.
Reblogging for comments. I’m keeping the other post I reblogged for reference. I apologize to everyone for not fact checking!
This looks like a public call to bloggers and journalists to pay attention to what is going on on @tjlcisthenewsexy ‘s Tumblr page. Unsure if real or ARG-devised, but either way there may be some wider attention focused on all of this fairly soon. The bitly link is a shortened link to the Vivala.me homepage – its purpose is likely to track how many people are using that particular link to check out Vivala.me. Brace yourselves, folks.
Fucky….
For those that don’t know already, he works for the company.
Literally this is what my ask to them was about, a research project on posthumous death ritual.
ANSWER ME
Umm. Ok. I’m not sure if I quite understand what’s going on here.
The header image of “Sabatiel”’s twitter is a reference to the group Anonymous. They wear Guy Fawkes masks when appearing in public.
He is a Digital Marketer & Marketing Specialist. This might actually e the ARG?!
From wiki: “Anonymous is a loosely associated international network of activist and hacktivist entities. A website nominally associated with the group describes it as “an Internet gathering” with “a very loose and decentralized command structure that operates on ideas rather than directives”. The group became known for a series of well-publicized publicity stunts and distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks on government, religious, and corporate websites.
Anonymous originated in 2003 on the imageboard4chan, representing the concept of many online and offline community users simultaneously existing as an anarchic, digitized global brain. Anonymous members (known as “Anons”) can be distinguished in public by the wearing of Guy Fawkes masks in the style portrayed in the graphic novel and film V for Vendetta.
In its early form, the concept was adopted by a decentralized online community acting anonymously in a coordinated manner, usually toward a loosely self-agreed goal, and primarily focused on entertainment, or “lulz”. Beginning with 2008’s Project Chanology—a series of protests, pranks, and hacks targeting the Church of Scientology—the Anonymous collective became increasingly associated with collaborative hacktivism on a number of issues internationally…..
…Broadly speaking, Anons oppose Internet censorship and control, and the majority of their actions target governments, organizations, and corporations that they accuse of censorship. Anons were early supporters of the global Occupy movement and the Arab Spring.[15] Since 2008, a frequent subject of disagreement within Anonymous is whether members should focus on pranking and entertainment or more serious (and, in some cases, political) activism….Brian Kelly writes that three of the group’s key characteristics are “(1) an unrelenting moral stance on issues and rights, regardless of direct provocation; (2) a physical presence that accompanies online hacking activity; and (3) a distinctive brand.”
Anonymous is also the one who sends Sherlock puzzles
And is ‘Anonymous’ also the one that hacks John’s blog?
He also posted stuff about vivala on the 7th. How long have we known about the site? I feel like it’s been less than a week, but idk anymore
Uh, a marketing specialist with hardly any followers or tweets?
🚨🚨huge red flag🚨🚨
And if he is indeed that…then he just wants to use is so…I think it’s time we take a huge step back from this you guys. Thelostspecial.com was fun. Now it’s just getting super weird and dark weblike
Sherlock Fandom Archive 