The groundbreaking television everyone’s been talking about, the history-making watercooler moment that is absolutely possible – the reason not even Rachel Talalay was allowed to read The Final Problem even though the episode got “leaked” and promoted by the BBC – can all be accomplished on Friday. The BBC’s nightly news coverage of President Trump’s inauguration can be “hacked” by Moriarty, breaking the fourth wall like they’ve done in other ways before, and alerting viewers to the “leaked final episode” of series 4 online. Because of the time difference, this news would reach Americans in the morning, exactly as the inaugural proceedings are happening. Instead of giving Trump the attention he so desperately wants, Sherlock online would take viewers away from American news sites. Now imagine if this new “leaked” episode contained homosexual subtext becoming text. Even those people not crazy about outing Sherlock like that would still be impressed, knowing gay love took the spotlight off President Trump’s inauguration. This is exactly the way to “give the viewers what they want, just not in the way they would expect”. This is exactly what needs to happen to get people talking about Sherlock for decades to come. This is exactly what needs to happen to redeem Sherlock for any chance at award season or getting a series 5. This would make Sherlock the water-cooler moment the BBC so desperately wants.
If this is how they choose to do it, if this is how they choose to tie up all the loose ends they left out, if this is how they choose to make use of all the extra scenes they filmed over the years, if they faked their own death to prove they’re clever, then for me, it will be worth the wound.
Rachel said she did read the script. She clarified that she hadn’t seen the episode. It’s on her tumblr.
Anyway, there’s a funny little moment when John, Sherlock and Mycroft are discussing what to do about their uhm bomb problem when we cut to Mrs Hudson, vacuuming to, ‘the number of the beast’, by Iron Maiden,
Now… Sure this is a funny little moment. We already saw that she is a badass in TLD so this fits: she does unexpectedly cool things, right? Except. Except this is a very unusual song choice for Mrs Hudson.
But, what was even the point of blowing up Baker Street? To up the stakes, to start the game, to be the maguffin that gets it all going, sure, but also, maybe, to throw in this weird reference. TST featured Margaret Thatcher, aka The Iron Lady, as someone who could provide some clues to Sherlock about Mary. Villain-coded and devil-coded Mary.
“At one point in TST Sherlock is stopped in front of a shrine of pictures of a very bad woman: Thatcher. He feels something is off but he’s not sure what. He has extreme foreboding here, the camera work, the lighting, the way the other people disappear. This shrine of Thatcher is about Mary. Mary is a very bad woman about whom he has a very bad feeling. And something is missing from the shrine: the bust containing the AGRA flash drive. So, Sherlock’s instincts tell him Mary is terrible and that he’s missing a piece of information about her: her secret agent past.”
Now, if you thought that the Moriarty element in TFP was silly well, it was. We saw a flashback and then, apparently, Eures had gotten him to film a series of uhm video clips for her to taunt Sherlock with 5 years later? Okay. The thing is Moriarty has been coded as satan I think since their conversation at Baker Street after the court case in TRF. He has an apple, he owes him a fall, this is symbolism about Sherlock being like Eve and eating the apple of the tree of knowledge and being ejected from Eden. In TAB Sherlock explicitly states that he’s waiting for the devil when he’s awaiting for Moriarty. But, no, in fact, Mrs Hudson tells that to Lestrade about why Sherlock is just sitting in his flat for days on end.
Magnussen also has been called the devil in HLV by Sherlock. He tells John he made, ‘a deal with the devil’.
All of the villains of Sherlock are connected to water (see @thepineapplering‘s meta here.) Water is connected to, among other things, emotions via four elements symbolism.
So Sherlock’s personal villains, his demons, his devils lurking beneath are emotions.That’s why all villains are associated to water.
In TFP Eures is literally on a island, she’s isolated and yet trapped by water, surrounded by water. Isolated and surrounded by feelings, trapped by feelings.
Now, let’s look at the lyrics to Iron Maiden’s, ‘the number of the beast’,
“Left alone, my mind was blank. I needed time to think to get the memories from my mind.
What did I see, can I believe, That what I saw that night was real And not just fantasy.
Just what I saw, in my old dreams, Were they reflections of my warped mind Staring back at me.
Cause in my dreams, it’s always there, The evil face that twists my mind and brings Me to despair.
Six-six-six the number of the beast. Hell and fire was spawned to be released.
Torches blazed and sacred chants were praised, As they start to cry, hands held to the sky. In the night, the fires burning bright, The ritual has begun, Satan’s work is done.
Six-six-six the number of the beast. Sacrifice is going on tonight.
I’m coming back, I will return, And I’ll possess your body and I’ll make you burn. I have the fire, I have the force.”
So, here we can see that this song that Mrs Hudson so innocently and hilariously is listing to is about a man’s visions and nightmares. From his own deepest fears, from his own psyche. He questions what he sees, what he sees is the face of the devil and the mark 666.
We’ve seen that TFP doesn’t make a lot of sense plot-wise and that everyone seems out of character. I mean The EMP warriors have been hammering out meta about this series being fake from day one, so I got nothing special to add to the idea that, ‘it was all a dream’, or, ‘it was all in his head’. But I do want to say that the devil imagery, the references to the devil, to a nightmare of the devil, that’s of your own making, to water/villians/emotions, all of this does go back to the idea that we’re in Sherlock’s psyche.
There is no sister but rather this is Sherlock’s most isolated essence. An essence that is lonely and wants to have a friend. But also one who’s, ‘killed’, said friends before. Meaning he’s both evil Eures and vulnerable, sad Eures. He’s a contradiction. He wants to get close to people and he wants to also bury his feelings in a well. He’s specifically afraid to get as close to John as he wants to be. But, he’s now even more afraid that if he pushes him away he will drive him away like he has already done in the past.
This is his emotional turning point, this is why the theme of, ‘emotional context’, is brought up again and again by Eures in seemingly disjointed ways. If you don’t face your fears, and face your emotions The Three Garridebs will die. The romance will die if you don’t dare face it. The friend in the well cannot wait forever. You can push your feelings down but eventually they will die. That person will stop loving you.. Your chance to love like John so adamantly insists at the end of TLD maybe be gone before you realise it.
Sherlock loved someone before and then he buried that. (I think that’s Sebastian from TBB). Now he sees himself doing the same thing to John. He needs to rescue his feelings for John from the well. The well of his own fear and indifference. The well full of feelings. His horror is emotions. This is his nightmare where nothing is more frightening than emotions.
Now Eures is a woman. Sherlock’s deepest emotional aspect is a woman. Now my friends cringed after TAB when I said that the women in that episode represented Sherlock’s feelings but I really do think that’s one of the meanings of TAB. Sherlock has always feared his emotions and preferred logic, the mind. The mind, the logical side, etc, has always been associated to the male aspect and to the east. Feelings, intuition, water, circles, has always been associated to women and to the west. Now, we have this contrast because Eures is, ‘the East Wind’, associated to being super intelligent, rational to a fault, to the point of being a full-on psycopath. But, but, there’s also little-girl-lost Eures who will be magically cured by a single hug from Sherlock (see the hug from TLD). His deepest self, his feelings, are armoured by this extreme reason, a cold calculating machine, a high-fucitininng sociopath. But, under some very fragile walls lies a very lonely vulnerable, deeply emotional child. (Remember his realising that the room he is trapped in his fake? Those are the flimsy walls of his cold exterior, inside is a weeping child who doesn’t know how to be integrate their strong feelings of love and fear). Remember how little Eures appears at Baker Street and implies she can’t differenciate beween her emotions after cutting herself? This is meant to show us that she’s disturbed and like inhumanly cold, right? Except that she’s not cutting up an animal (or other behaviours associated to childhood psychopathy) she’s hurting herself and trying to understand her many feelings. She is confused by them but not lacking them.
Sherlock is Eures: lonely and trapped by her emotions and yet she can leave at any time. Sherlock can be free at any time. (Remember, ‘I want to break free’, by Queen playing as Moriarty got out of the helicopter and made a sexual joke?) Moriarty represents Sherlock’s sex drive (remember he says he’s Mr Sex in TRF and is Sherlock’s id, in chains, in the basement, in HLV). His sex drive/Moriarty wants to a) break free and b) visit Eures island of emotional isolation. He needs to integrate his sexual and his emotional feelings, that’s why Moriarty and Eures must meet. At Christmas. A time when Sherlock and John try to talk about their emotions, year after year, it seems.
During 5 minutes at Christmas Sherlock’s sexual attraction and his feelings met for the first and only time, maybe. Maybe it’s in ASiB? Maybe it’s in HLV? We can speculate as to which 5 minutes were most poignant and why but I think we can see that every once in a while, maybe on a special occasion like Christmas or a birthday (TLD hug) we can have a break through where emotion and attraction meet and you know, break free.
PS we saw a sort of villainous version of John in TLD via Culverton (with tons of deeply sexual overtones) from @warmth-and-constancy. And then we see John go into the balcony at Sherrinford and just plain old look at the water. We see him in relation to water just as we first see Culverton. John, again, is being subtly coded as a villain. But, why? Because John is the person that Sherlock’s in love with. He is the villain because he is making Sherlock face his deepest fear. Sherlock is literally horrified of being in love, hence John and the water imagery.
Eures literally is Samara Morgan from the Ring and from Appointment with Samarra. Sherlock must inevitably face her, his inner fears, his deepest demons. And Samara from the Ring becomes a supernatural monster because she was abused, neglected, left alone. She died in a well. This is Sherlock’s monstrous side (remember, ‘he’s our monster’, from TLD?). A little child who just needed love but instead was isolated and alone. This is Sherlock. Literally being Samara and having an appointment with himself. (Here I was talking about Appointment with Samarra vs Samara Morgan but with John as the little girl)
When he said he needed to go, ‘deeper into himself’, in TAB, well, he wasn’t kidding.
Oh, one more thing, the reason that Mrs Hudson’s song struck me was because that scene is followed by one where a guy says he doesn’t know where Sherlock is and then we see those two fisherman on a boat. The camera angle is very low and instead of cutting back and forth we get a (seemingly) continuous shot. The effect is nauseating and discombobulating (suggestive of being a dream). We also see this odd object on the wall that looks like a simplified devil logo: a face and horns,
But also I just realised it’s also a circle. And a mirror. So this is Sherlock’s greatest fear, greatest horror: feelings and introspection with regards to said feelings. That’s the true devil, here, the true villain.
I don’t have a huge following on here but I just have to say that the lost episode theory is beyond unlikely.
1. We saw no additional setlock scenes (aside from some involving Mary giving birth) that were totally thrown away or could have made for an additional episode’s worth of material.
2. Sherlock is one of the BBC’s most popular shows. They would NOT just give up the opportunity to market a fourth episode and lose all that viewership. It’s just not a smart move.
3. Apple Tree Yard, while having a sparse IMDB page, does involve real actors and definitely seems to be a real show. Again, it would be a waste of money to lose the Sherlock audience by marketing something completely unrelated.
I’m really sorry, I’m so so sorry, but I would not get my hopes up for a secret episode. I disliked TFP as much as all of you, but I don’t think they’re redeeming themselves this way.
Okay, this is officially my first post on tumblr because I believe that the following is very important after watching the ‘final’ episode of Sherlock Season 4.
A few hours before the airing of TFP we get this article on radio times:
The important part is the last half of the article:
‘“Must be something comforting about the number three,” says Sherlock.
“People always give up after three…” before revealing that he has
hidden another device in the walking stick John brought into the room
earlier.Knowing that they might not be able to get the increasingly busy
Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman back together to shoot more
Sherlock for the foreseeable future, did show creators Mark Gatiss and
Steven Moffat take the opportunity to film an extra episode while they
had the chance?If so, when would it air?’
Okay, nothing new there but then it comes:
‘The schedules for Sunday 22nd January show
that BBC1 has something called Apple Tree Yard on at 9pm. But then if
they wanted to keep the secret, the Sherlock team would hardly advertise
it in the listings would they? And anyway, perhaps they’re saving it as
a surprise for later in the year.So is this a possibility? Could there really be a fourth episode of Sherlock series four, a farewell gift to fans?Well, no… not according to Steven Moffat, who was unequivocal when the question was put to him.“It doesn’t reflect the fact that there’s gong to be a fourth episode
– for heaven’s sake, what kind of secrets do you think we’re keeping?!“Let’s go home and check. Oh look episode four… the lost special…"‘
Let’s look at that sentence again: ‘The schedules for Sunday 22nd January show
that BBC1 has something called Apple Tree Yard on at 9pm.’
So the supposedly last episode of Sherlock S4 just aired and there was no mention of an additional episode before less alone a possible date for it and now radio times publishes an article that links Sherlock to the yet to be aired BBC mini series Apple Tree Yard.
Note that is is the only source out there that makes a connection between Sherlock S4 and Apple Tree Yard.
So what do we get when we search for Apple Tree Yard on the BBC’s website?
Just one episode is listed for 22 January at exactly 9 pm. Even though the mini series is supposed to have 4 episodes in total.
Does the number 4 ring a bell, anyone?
And now have a look at the content description of Apple Yard Tree’s first episode:
I mean, come on, a doctor? An enigmatic stranger? More is at play (’It’s not a game anymore’)? This could be literally taken out of Sherlock.
And what are the names of the two leading actors in this book adaption? (That by the way is described on Amazon.com as ‘suspenseful, erotically charged, and masterfully paced (…) intelligent psychological thriller about desire and its consequences’)
The doctor is played by Emily Watson and the enigmatic stranger by Ben Chaplin.
It may seem far-fetched to assume that they would fake a trailer and pay actors to stay quiet about pretending to have played a mini series when nothing but the trailer actually happened in reality BUT.
But you never know with the producers of this show, do you?
My (very strong) guess is: Next Sunday we are going to see the ‘lost special’ that is going to make history.
I mean, let’s face it. Today’s episode was not ‘television history’.
But hiding a 4th additional episode in ‘plain sight’ by disguising it as an episode of a mini series with a plot description that very well plays into the ‘insane wish fullfilment’ we have been promised? That’s genius.
“I think you draw the eye with disguise,” Gatiss agreed. “It goes right
back to the first series – ‘the element of disguise is learning how to
hide in plain sight’ is what Sherlock says, and that’s exactly what it’s
all about
The dialogue included: “Can be wonderful, can be terrifying.” “What did you say?” “Something that drives you in and crushes you to nothing.” “We are going to have different versions of the same story.” “Do you want to hear the wildest story of them all?” “You’re starting to intrigue me.” “It’s all just one big performance.” “We are going to be busy, you and I”
But if it turns out that they made a female Watson in order to make Johnlock then I don’t know what I’d do.
I didn’t even see this trailer OMG! I
agree that even if there is another episode, the ‘real’lost
special,, and it is indeed all we ever dreamed of…this stunt is
going a bit too far just to troll the mainstream media.
@inevitably-johnlocked said that the
promo for Apple Tree Yard already happened a year ago so maybe, sadly
it’s not going to be aired next Sunday. (btw, I don’t think they
would pull off fem!John lmao because that would be just as insane as
this episode so please don’t worry about that 🙂
Anyhow, I’m not giving up hope yet
because this last episode?
That’s the epitome of a typically
heterosexual horror/action movie.
I mean, two main characters on a death
mission: Reminding themselves to be soldiers (perfected with a manly
nod and a bro handshake), people dropping like flies because of a
super villain no one knew before existed at all and who has the power
to command everything and everyone, even the power to make rooms
appear out of thin air and make them vanish again, Sherlock walking
like a proper gangster whilst holding a huge gun, bad explosions,
life or death decisions – could it be more fake?
This feels like a parody because it is.
I WANT TO BELIEVE. I did speculate they could be showing it on the 29th, yes, even though the schedule is showing something else on that slot. Sherlock is BBC’s biggest Drama. They could afford the surprise if they wanted to. Everything sounds fishy, their silence, the clues about a fourth epsode within the show, the fact that nothing makes sense… BUT THE THING IS that this waiting is plain cruel. Why not advertising the real ending? Why do it this way?
hi! re: your post about the possible 4th episode on that website… i was looking at time warner cable’s sherlock page and there is a guide for a possible 4th episode? it’s not a piracy site and can be found here
WHAT THE FUCK IS HAPPENING? WHY THEY PLAY WITH US LIKE THIS? YOU BRUTES
I wouldn’t appreciate being toyed with like this, but I’m finding that I just don’t care enough right now.
“THERE MUST BE SOMETHING COMFORTING ABOUT THREE, PEOPLE TEND TO GIVE UP AFTER THREE” called it
If this is a real thing happening then it better fucking be good and make up for all this bullshit
Well, it’d be ‘goundbreaking’ and it’d make history at least
If THIS is what they’re talking about and it turns out to actually happen then they did just fucking make television history because I don’t believe no one else has done this, and as much as I am excited, I’m also still very pissed off.
Yep, still pissed too and even if the episode is awesome, it will never be enough to forgive what happened since yesterday and how bad some of us feel. I can really see why they’d do that but I’m not sure it’d be worth all the pain and the wrong they’ve done
It would also explain why this season took longer to do if they planned more than three episodes.
i am fully on the tinfoil hat train now and i want to apologize in advance for getting people’s hopes up but i just needed to add that a few weeks ago, my boyfriend (who works at the video streaming subscription site vudu) asked me why there were four episodes of sherlock this season because they got an order to plan for four slots
now, i personally think that the likelihood is great that this fourth slot simply indicates that all of the theater extras are being given their own episode slot
but also
i want to believe
Yahoo search for “BBC Sherlock” is also showing a 4th episode for next week….
That was, without question, a deliberate self-sabotage bursting at the seams with one red flag after another that it WAS a deliberate self-sabotage (most broadly summarized by “everything in it was not merely a departure from the writers’ character bible but a mirror opposite of it”) and my Current Mood is watchful waiting to find out why it happened, because there absolutely is a larger story here, because it absolutely, completely, 100% was deliberate, and inexplicable cruelty is only one possible explanation. (As a motive, I mean. Cruelty can be and indeed is the outcome, even if it wasn’t the intent.)
This doesn’t mean I’m not upset or pissed off or bewildered. I am all of those things, but I am, at the same time, very much convinced that there is a reason this episode exists, and that reason can not be chalked up to mere incompetence and forgetfulness. The ways in which it is bad are too elaborate and specific and too easily pointed out and fixed at any stage in the production and post-production processes to have occurred through simple carelessness. Its badness has every hallmark of planning. The objectively strange behavior of key people involved in its creation lends further credence to that view. My only question now is why.